3

[Beanie Review] Romance in the House

It’s your time to shine, Beanies! Add your voice to the community and help Dramabeans provide trustworthy fan(atic) reviews for people looking for their next drama.

Provide a quick review of this drama in the comments below for the benefit (or is that safety?) of others. Please keep your reviews as spoiler-free as possible and share your thoughts on the show’s overall quality, squee-factor, writing, etc. (Standard character limit applies).

 
RELATED POSTS

Tags: ,

3

Required fields are marked *

If you want a good family drama with lots of heart, this is it.
If you want a mature and healthy—but cute, portrait of a romantic relationship between adults, this is it.
If you want to see a healing story and some lovely character development, this is it.
If you just wanna have fun, this is it.

This isn't a masterpiece, but the quality is good. The team behind this knew what they were doing.
Such a charming and heartwarming drama.

6
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

A simple little family drama. Decent dual love stories. Very watchable. But the focus was on family and healing. Did I FF through a lot? Yes. But that is because the humor didn't really appeal to me. But, the family moments were nice. 5 out of 10.

2
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Short, sweet, solid.

This is a family drama, focused on healing and redemption of past regrets and wrongs, with 2 generations of romance sprinkled in (I say sprinkled, cos the romcom is an auxiliary feature to the primary focus on family).

Drama explores facets of family dynamics seldom seen in K-dramas (at least I haven't) in surprisingly nuanced and perceptive ways.

Think: Vibes of a weekender (but without the makjang and meanderings) + some romcom.

It sets out to do what it said it would do, and delivered without over-selling (unlike another show next door). On that count alone, I give it an 8.

One tiny gripe: Change the title pls (Romance in the House is kinda misleading).

Maybe call it: "How did President Byeon Get Rich?" (ok, even more misleading) 🤣🤣

3
0
reply

Required fields are marked *