85

Queen Woo: Episodes 1-4

When Goguryeo’s monarch dies, the surviving queen must fend for herself amidst the adversaries that want her gone. Queen Woo weaves a sprawling web of ulterior motives and political scheming, but its narrative is marred by gratuitous scenes that detract from its central theme.

 
EPISODES 1-4

Our story begins in 197, on the battlefield. Goguryeo’s king GO NAM-MU (Ji Chang-wook) began a war to reclaim territories wrested away by the Han dynasty, and after two arduous years, they’re down to the final plot of land. Before battle, Go Nam-mu consults the great shaman SABI (Oh Hanee), who foretells an auspicious day heralding victory — but what she doesn’t disclose is that she’d also seen a vision of the king’s bloody corpse.

Against all expectations, Go Nam-mu successfully outwits the enemy by turning their strategy against them. Claiming the severed head of the enemy general, our king returns victorious, despite sustaining injuries. Needless to say, several conniving ministers are quite displeased by his survival.

Meanwhile, in the palace, our eponymous queen WOO HEE (Jeon Jong-seo) predicts the king’s exact strategy. Possessing a brilliant mind and battle tactics on par with her husband, Woo Hee is matched only by the loyal prime minister EUL PA-SO (Kim Mu-yeol!), who goes head-to-head with her in a game of chess.

As it turns out, these three go way back. A young Go Nam-mu had been instantly captivated by Woo Hee when she shot an arrow to save him from a street scammer, and Eul Pa-so had observed the scene from the sidelines. Eight years later, Woo Hee grew into a headstrong young lady capable of sparring against grown men, and she’d harbored a dream of becoming an infantry general.

That is, until Woo Hee overhears her spoiled older sister protesting against her arranged marriage. Why, she wants to be queen, not sequestered away in the frigid northern region with the second prince! Unable to stand idly by, Woo Hee volunteers in her sister’s place — and that’s how she winds up wed to Go Nam-mu. Before long, they fall in love, growing up together and training in the harsh winter.

As for Eul Pa-so, he caught Go Nam-mu’s eye 28 years ago, when he rose to the top ranks in a chess tournament alongside a crossdressing Woo Hee. Twenty years later, when Go Nam-mu rose to the throne, he sought out Eul Pa-so to appoint him as his prime minister. Nevermind that Eul Pa-so has been tilling fields all this time, or that unilaterally appointing him goes against all customs — Go Nam-mu will have no other as his right-hand man.

However, not all eyes look kindly upon our unconventional trio. Not only do the ministers scorn Eul Pa-so for his humble farmer’s background, but they also clamor for Woo Hee’s dethronement. What use is a queen who hasn’t been able to bear a son? Leading the opposition is the west minister HAE DAE-BU (Oh Dae-seok), who clings to the historical precedent of the Go and Hae clans sitting upon the throne in turns. Hae Dae-bu covets the throne alongside MYUNGRIM EORU (Lee Do-yeob), who seeks to control the queen’s seat. Thwarted by Go Nam-mu’s battle victory, Dae-bu makes contact with the “hidden one,” declaring that “the king must die.”

Closer yet is WOO SUN (Jung Yumi), Woo Hee’s older sister and the head of the royal maids. Bitter that her sister — her replacement — rose to the throne when it should have been her, Woo Sun tries and fails to seduce Go Nam-mu in his bath. Her distraught jealousy leaves her vulnerable to manipulation, and thus Sabi swoops in with a love potion. One drop, and the king will fall in love with her. But while Woo Sun is busy adding three drops to the king’s tea, Sabi spikes her cup. In Woo Sun’s mind, she’s joining bodies with Go Nam-mu; in reality, it’s Sabi who’s taking her to bed.

Go Nam-mu is all too aware of the forces that seek to topple his queen, and he resolves to protect her in the only way he’s able to. Not only does he push Woo Hee away by engaging in completely unnecessary sexual debauchery right in front of her, but he also arranges for her to be dethroned and sent away from the palace before her dissidents can harm her.

Except he succumbs first. Woo Sun’s — or rather, Sabi’s — poison has done him in. Eul Pa-so is amongst the first to discover the king’s corpse, alongside the stoic bodyguard MIL-WOO (Yoo Eui-tae) and the seemingly shifty minister SONG WOO (Kim Do-yoon), and he orders it covered up for the time being. Woo Hee must flee for her life, before those who hold a grudge against Go Nam-mu can come for her neck.

However, Woo Hee swallows her grief, and insists on an alternative. She cannot let the throne fall into undeserving hands. That prompts Eul Pa-so to bring up the custom of levirate marriage, in which a late king’s widow marries his younger brother to maintain power. Despite the reservations of her father WOO SO (Jeon Bae-soo), the calculating family head WOO DO (Jo Han-chul) is immediately onboard — Woo Hee must marry the third prince and protect the Woo clan.

With that, Woo Hee departs toward the turf of GO BAL-KI (Lee Soo-hyuk). Her entourage comprises her loyal bodyguard YOO-AH (Park Jung-won), the king’s faithful royal guard MU GOL (Park Ji-hwan), the flirty former royal horseman MO CHI (Lee Hae-woo), and Woo Sun. They have until sunrise to bring the prince back to the palace.

No sooner have they crossed the perimeter into Go Bal-ki’s territory, than they’re greeted by the desecrated bodies of innocent commoners strung up in the trees. The third prince is a callous tyrant who murders his terrified subjects for sport, and our quick-witted queen immediately switches tack, spinning a cover story to conceal the king’s death. To her retinue, Woo Hee declares that she will marry a different prince — she cannot hand the throne’s power over to such a cruel and bloodthirsty man.

Within the palace walls, Eul Pa-so investigates further into the king’s death, narrowing down the poison to one only accessible in the palace. He’s on Sabi’s tail, though Sabi warns him that his star’s light is fading — his life may be on the line. Still, Eul Pa-so is undeterred, even when a mole leaks the king’s death and Woo Hee’s plan via a homing pigeon to the Myungrim clan.

As a countermeasure, Eul Pa-so sends his own message to YEON BI (Park Bo-kyung) of Jolbon. As the direct descendant of the royal Yeon Ta-bal, she seeks to reclaim the lands that Chumo (a.k.a. Jumong) took in his founding of Goguryeo. Massacring her way into a meeting of the clans that lay claim to the queen’s position, Yeon Bi orders Myungrim Eoru to recall the assassins he sent after Woo Hee, then fatally stabs him in the neck. Well, I can’t say I’m sorry to see him go.

Circling back to our queen’s cohort, they sneak out of Go Bal-ki’s domain under the cover of the night. Alas, Woo Sun is tormented by her guilt-fuelled hallucinations of Sabi, which goad her into tattling on her sister to the Hae clan. In turn, the crafty Hae clan tips off Go Bal-ki, offering to put him on the throne if he shares it with them. Infuriated by Woo Hee’s deception, Go Bal-ki sends the brutish White Tiger hunters — led by NWE-EUM (Won Hyun-joon) — to capture her alive. Then Go Bal-ki ruthlessly murders his wife, so that she and the Jwa clan cannot get in the way of his potential levirate marriage to Woo Hee.

That brings me to my primary criticism of this show — it overindulges in gratuitous nudity and sex, at the expense of its women. Nearly every female character, aside from Woo Hee and her bodyguard, is introduced via a sexual encounter. I don’t see the need for Sabi to conduct her divinations with her naked breasts on display, or for Woo Sun to be drugged and duped into sex with Sabi, or for Yeon Bi to have a servant eat her out in front of her court. Even more appalling is the explicit rape in episode 4 — we already know Go Bal-ki is vicious, we don’t need to witness him assaulting his wife before murdering her in cold blood.

Given that this is a story centered around a strong and capable female protagonist, it feels counterintuitive — and hypocritical — to reduce its supporting female cast to sexual objects. It also reeks of lazy writing, given the myriad of alternative ways power and control can be depicted. I’m tired of seeing women objectified and fetishized on the pretext of making a show “dark,” “gritty,” or “realistic” — and that last point is particularly laughable, given the historical inaccuracies this show has already been criticized for. Sex and sexuality can be portrayed onscreen in a tasteful and respectful manner, but instead, Queen Woo used such themes for mere shock value and titillation. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth, and I’m disappointed in the show’s creators.

It’s a shame, really, because this show had so much going for it. A solid cast packed with established veterans, and a turbulent political landscape in a period of history not often explored — not to mention the intriguingly fraught relationships between the Go brothers. The arrogant crown prince, GO PAE-EUI (Song Jae-rim!) had been passed over by his own father in favor of Go Nam-mu, and he bears an entrenched grudge. Especially since Go Nam-mu sliced off his nose as punishment for treason. Go Pae-eui has been biding his time in exile, and now his chance has finally come.

As for the remaining brothers, we don’t get to see much of them yet, but I’m already itching to find out what secrets they’re hiding up their sleeves. There’s the fourth prince GO YEON-WOO (Kang Young-seok!), who wept sorrowfully for the dying Go patriarch — but were they crocodile tears, or genuine ones? Then there’s the youngest prince GO GYE-SOO (Jung Jae-kwang, whom I’m excited to see again after Connection). Go Gye-soo has consistently demonstrated allegiance to Go Nam-mu, whom he holds in high regard, and perhaps that’s why Woo Hee has decided to marry him instead — though I wonder if there’s a reason she skipped over Go Yeon-woo.

The drama’s first half leaves off upon a cliffhanger, with Sabi realizing her divination may have been erroneous. Instead of Woo Sun as queen, Sabi now sees Woo Hee standing before a throne of crows, decked in full regalia with a sword in her hand. An omen portending more upheaval to come, perhaps. I’ll still be tuning in to see how this tale ends, but I’m afraid I’ll be harboring a wary distrust of its storytellers every step of the way.

 
RELATED POSTS

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

85

Required fields are marked *

*deep sigh*

Well. I guess that's one way to get me to drop a 3K drama I've been waiting two years for and was fairly adamant I could sit through despite how bad it might decide to be.
There's "NC17 History" and then there's whatever the everloving gratuitous shit that was.

Oh, but it also wasn't actually good outside of *that* either.
For one, the directing was a nightmare, especially regarding pacing and the direction of a lot of the actors. Talk about telegraphing.

And I was tragically bored on top of everything and could not find it in myself to care about what was happening.
Probably because it seemed to be more interested in shocking me with continuous gratuitous nudity and sex scenes and jumping between events and timelines like piñata on a pogo stick, than it was in establishing its characters and story properly, and in a truly engaging way. This is the cheapest of all tactics, people, come on.

And he pulled out an arrow! Boooo!

So, good riddance!

16
9
reply

Required fields are marked *

I've only watched episode 1 and had to create a timeline because my head was spinning.

Which episode did you stop at?

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Seconding your comments on the directing, and laughing at your booing of the arrow-pulling because I had the exact same reaction lol! That is not how you deal with an arrow wound!

3
7
reply

Required fields are marked *

He pulled an arrow out?! I must've blinked and missed or something because I was sure he only broke it shorter for convenience... Also this whole scene made me seriously question the quality of his armor.

0
5
reply

Required fields are marked *

Nah he gave it a good old quality YANK.

1
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

It looks like it hit him in the backside, but the wound ended up in the side of his stomach.
What's with all the close-range shooting? Would it be less effective for an arrow to do more damage unless it's a crossbow? I'm starting to doubt this PD ever worked with Kim Han-min in "War of the Arrow."

1

@kiara
I don't think there was a single thing about the battle sequences that was accurate, Kiara 🤣.
You CAN shoot at close range but it's not very practical and not a very effective use of a long range weapon, and leaves you drastically open to enemy infantry. Not that there were any spearmen actually fighting either though, so. 🙄
At least they had the right kinds of swords? 🤣

3

No wonder he didn't live long with that kind of smarts...

2

Did you notice the king's war boots? I thought I'd seen them on one of Goguryeo's murals, but maybe they were slightly different. The horse's armor also existed.

1

Where there is arrow pulling, there will always be Sic to be annoyed at it 🤣

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

The gratuitous violence and pornographic sex scenes were nothing more than a smokescreen and a lazy attempt to distract from the weak writing and bad direction (the classic hallmark of a creatively bankrupt hack)

"Moving" was extremely violent yet it still managed to tell a compeling story with characters that you cared about, it also managed to leverage the talents of a stacked and talented ensemble in ways that this drama completely fails at.

Oh well, it will get attention which is likely why the production team made the choices they made

11
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

And MOVING did NOT use gratuitous violence against women at all, neither did A SHOP FOR KILLERS. Both have extreme violence but the violence is there for a reason.

When a show has gratuitious violence against women, I steer clear of it.

7
reply

Required fields are marked *

I quit watching Hollywood TV dramas for a reason: Excessive sex and nudity. I am no prude or whatsoever. I do read historical romance novels (with bedroom scenes). But, the amount nudity and sex scenes is too much for me to handle. Let's hope the second half does better. Otherwise, it will be the third drama that I am disappointed with this year.

9
13
reply

Required fields are marked *

There is nothing prudish about being uncomfortable with Nudity or any other form of vulgarity.

We have different perspectives, values and tolerance levels, what works for one person will not work for the other and thats okay.

There is nothing wrong with your opinion.

9
10
reply

Required fields are marked *

Comment was deleted

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Thank you for respecting my thoughts. I thought I will be attacked or criticized for sure.

4
6
reply

Required fields are marked *

I had similar worries when I mentioned my initial thoughts. There can be purposeful nudity, but the show just used it for shock value. I'd rather time be spent on character development and plot.

5
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Sorry, I just woke up guys and read your message. The idea behind the drama is really good, just that I was not used to this level of sex and nudity in a saeguk or an Asian costume drama.

2

I actually also had similar trepidations while writing this review, so thank you for sharing your thoughts! I do think society attaches too much unwarranted shame to sex and nudity, but the pushback to that should not be to label valid criticism of excessive sex and nudity as being prudish or puritanical. The manner of depiction matters, and that's what we're critiquing here!

5
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Thanks for answering and understanding. It is really hard for me to come up with my first respond when it comes to saeguk. I am glad you are fine and not offended with my comment.

1

You should feel safe here voicing your opinions without worrying about being attacked or downvoted to hell, like on Reddit.

4
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Thank you. Reading all those comments (especially those attacking people who have different ideas) made me avoid commenting on Reddit.

2

“… Nudity or any other form of vulgarity.”

Do you consider nudity, in and of itself, vulgar?

2
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

No i do not, but in the context of storytelling it has to make sense in terms of the overall narrative.

Sometimes violence and nudity can be used as an effective storytelling device

(although i do think good writers and directors do not need gimmicks to tell a story)

4
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Thanks for clarifying. I think the issue I see so often in DB discussions is that people have very different ideas about when violence and nudity are an organic part of a drama, and when they are gratuitous and gimmicky. I haven’t started watching Queen Woo yet. The wide range of opinions I’m seeing here make me interested in seeing what everyone’s talking about.

5

Even though I don't feel the same, I completely respect your opinion and am certain you aren't alone. I will also be very interested in how this show plays with a domestic audience.

3
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Comment was deleted

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

I started watching, and the second they had nudity (which was like within 5 minutes of the beginning) I was done. The one thing I hate about any shows now is the nudity and sex. Not just alluding to sex, but it's full on simulated. It's porn. We're normalizing porn. The studio heads need to stop this. Netflix and other studios are going too far. I don't care if they attach a mature rating, it's PORN, rate X not R. Also, Kdramas were my safe place where I didn't have to watch the ick.

I don't want to watch porn, so I don't watch porn. But then bam right in the middle of my kdrama - porn. Glad I didn't turn it on in the middle of the afternoon with the kids running around.

Any nudity, or sex scenes that show nudity, or ew people emoting sex - like what's the purpose? It does nothing for the plot, or character development. If you have to rely on sex and nudity to sell your plot, it's lame. If you need to add it, because you think sex sells, then did you really write/direct/act something of value or did you write/direct/act in porn. They really thought they were gonna be the Asian Game of Thrones. The whole vibe of the into was a GOT knock off. Let's just call this for what it is.

It's simply a faction in the entertainment industry trying to normalize porn.

Brother ew

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

it's hard to shock me these days, but i was shocked. why would they have to show so much nudity and sex/rape to aid the story? there seems to be no one with any redeeming social value in line with the throne... so will they stop with the graphic crap and get on with the story?

7
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Personally, and this might be an unpopular opinion, I don't think this show is that gratuitous. I've seen way worse, and I've seen female characters be treated way worse (including in a lot of other sageuks I've seen). The women in this show, for the most part, feel quite powerful. The men are either busy playing politics, or catch-up to something we already know, while the women are taking action. Yeonbi & Sabi use their bodies, and other people, because they can, and they have the power to do so. Does that make them sexual objects? I'd even argue they are doing things that normally a man would do. Honestly, so far, in more ways than one, the women are running the show. The only reason this plot even happens is because a woman took action.

But really, I think everybody's opinion on the sex & nudity is a personal thing, and it will either bother you or not. As is the case with the graphic scenes in regards to violence and stuff. It's an endless discussion that will probably just go in circles.

I'm not gonna pretend this show is perfect, it's not, far from it, but none of my problems are connected to the graphic nature of the show. I think a lot of aspects could do with more development, but I kinda think part of the problem here is that there are only 8 episodes, and there's a lot of ground to cover, so the show would need more episode to really explore everything in depth. Regardless, I really like what we've got so far, and I'm excited for the last 4 episodes.

11
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

I do agree with you that it's good to see women driving the plot through their own agency, and strategising to hold their own against men. I'm not inherently against women using their bodies to achieve their goals, but I think the excessive focus on it is deserving of scrutiny.

There are many alternatives the show could have taken — say, Yeon Bi’s power over the men in her court could have been depicted through her using the male servant as a footstool instead. Sabi didn’t need to reveal her body in her first scene, nor sleep with Woo Sun after she’d already unknowingly poisoned the king’s tea. Go Bal-ki’s assault of his wife could have been removed entirely, or at least portrayed in a less graphic manner. Yet the show chose to take things in an explicitly sexual direction, time and time again.

When a show's only depiction of sex between women is a nonconsensual (or at best, dubcon) encounter with neither participant showing any interest in women outside of this scene, I can’t help but view it as a fetishisation of the act rather than genuine representation. And when a show chooses to explicitly depict rape without any telegraphing beforehand or subsequent focus on the victim, I cannot see it as anything else but shock value at the expense of its audience and assault survivors. Especially given how women are the only ones forced into such positions and driven to use such alternative methods. The men in this show have not been debased or sexualised in a similar manner.

Of course, men wouldn’t have needed to resort to other methods, since they held (and still hold) power and status by sheer virtue of their gender. But even if the show was trying to make such social commentary, it does not afford its women enough of the narrative to explore their marginalisation. Ultimately, it still subjects its women to the male gaze, without doing enough to criticise the actions of men or subvert the victimisation of women.

Compared to some other media, Queen Woo may be far from the worst offender, but that doesn't absolve it from the harmful notions it is perpetuating. Women can appear nude without being sexualised, and women can engage in sex without being fetishised. These themes are not inherently wrong or morally corrupt. Rather, it is the way the show handles and depicts them — insensitively and distastefully, in my opinion — that I have a bone to pick with. I’m not upset by the graphic nature itself, I’m upset by the way the show’s creators chose to depict it.

(Also just to clarify, I don’t mean to target your opinion specifically, this was just the earliest and thus easiest comment to reply to! I’m glad to engage in such discourse, everything above is my personal opinion, and we can agree to disagree :) )

7
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

While the show is indeed graphic when it comes to the sexual nature, I also think it's graphic when it comes to the violence etc. There will always be alternatives when it comes to stuff like that, but it's a choice the show made, and I think either choice is valid. Sure, the show could've been less explicit, and asked us to read between the lines, but then at the end of the day, that stuff still happened, and honestly, I don't think that makes it any better.

Yes, the rape was disgusting, and it's the only scene where I think the show might've gone a bit too far. That scene can be incredibly triggering to some people, and I think appropriate trigger warnings should be provided (I'm unsure if Korea does this, but I think trigger warnings are important).

But I do think the show was trying to tell and show us something with it's sexual scenes, and how those are presented is often rather interesting. I actually think the amount of actual nudity depicted is rather minor. The rape, the biggest offender, shows us the personal danger Queen Woo is in if he gets the throne. It's disgusting, but I think that's the point. Yeonbi uses men to satisfy her own needs, because she has the power to do that, effectively turning the men into sexual objects that she can use. The Sabi and WooSun scene is interesting, because it's effectively two scenes focusing on both of their desires: Sabi having sex with WooSun, and WooSun having sex with the King. I think it's interesting how, in either scene, the only actual nudity shown is from the woman who's desire was specifically being depicted. I think their desires, and how they act and want to act upon them were the focus here. Obviously, I'm not agreeing with the character's actions, but I'm just saying what I took from those scenes, and how I think there's an argument to be made that they're not pointless, or overly excessive.

I do want to state that I'm certainly not trying to undermine your opinion, or anyone else's. I just felt the need to further clarify my thoughts based on the points you brought up, which are all valid, and I don't disagree with all of them. What the show tried to depict is far from perfect, but I don't think bad intentions were involved.

3
reply

Required fields are marked *

I admit, the trailer didn't really prepare me for what to expect in the first four episodes, but after I adjusted my expectations a bit, the episodes really captivated me (but I also like series like Game of Thrones, Hannibal, ...). I really liked episode 3 in particular with the dark, menacing mood that engulfed everything else.

Are the sex scenes really necessary? No, certainly not, but the same can be said of the violent scenes. And I personally find violence more problematic for a younger audience (we're talking about a drama with a very high age rating here) than a few naked upper bodies, for example. But that's just my opinion, of course, and I understand if others see it differently.

4
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

@solstices Thank you for the recap! I see its not worth it, I can happily drop this. I was very intrigued by the stills and costumes. But I never liked any historical dramas as it always has a tragic ending.

The beauty of kdrama is and always was the way the characters are chiseled and story is edited. I'm no prude, this just isn't my cup of tea.

4
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Well, that sucks. I was really looking forward to this show. Nevertheless, I had a fun time delving into the historical background of this era, and I can't stop yet. I'm very good at using the ff button when needed.😂

10
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Thanks for sharing all the work you did!

3
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

You are welcome!

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

The nudity and sex scenes didn't bother me so much. The women had desires or will and acted on them.

I was disapointed by Lee Joo-Suk character, he was a caricature. At least in The Scholar who Walks the Night, he was a vampire.

Ji Chang-Wook was really good in this role. I never liked his characters in sageuk. I'm happy there were a lot of flashbacks with him. I wonder what was the story with the Crown Prince, it looked like it traumatized the 3rd Prince.

I liked the Queen was a badass but they could develop her and other characters more.

What will be the future of Eul Pa-So, the ministers were against his appointment.

10
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

"I wonder what was the story with the Crown Prince, it looked like it traumatized the 3rd Prince."

I think that what happened to the Crown Prince fueled the third princes' paranoia.

2
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

I hope his character's paranoia would make sense, like Lee Bang-won in SFD.
He sounds like a psycho kid who killed his nanny's (wet nurse) child at 6 six years old because he wanted to be the only one she could feed. Since he wasn't punished, he kept on killing people senselessly.
He is easily triggered, so the noseless CP's situation isn't helping either.

1
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

LOL at "noseless CP's situation." They did seem to be going with the psychopathy angle with his whole childhood story.

And yes, I agree with your comment about SFD. At least that show had time to develop its characters over the course of its sixty episodes.

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Those ministers opposed his appointment because Eul Paso supported the common people and bolstered the king's authority, which weakened their power. The Jindae Law or Grain Law allowed the people to turn to the government for help instead of being slaves to the nobles.
The leader of the Myeongrim clan is especially salty because the position of prime minister is now given to a farmer instead of his clan, as in the past.

His first strategic move was to reveal the king's death to Yeon Bi, save the queen, and get rid of his biggest critic. I think he'll be fine.

3
reply

Required fields are marked *

The show was fine. I didn't hate it, but I didn't love it either. The nudity was unnecessary. It added nothing to the story at all. It was just shoehorned in. I'll watch the back 4 too.

5
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Re: shaman having visions with her Samantha and Rachel out - I believe there WERE some traditions in the ancient world where divination rituals included nudity (to ease connection to gods and whatnot), but I don't think I've ever heard of that detail being a thing in Korean shamanism specifically. Can someone clarify or perhaps redirect me to a more knowledgeable sources? Maybe it was just a personal preference of hers - girl was FAST to drop her top in sex scene with Sister Moron too.

I also don't fully agree with recapper about show objectifying women - I think it was objectifying everyone, more or less (JCW has shown more skin than anyone so far), with an interesting bit of NOT doing so in the only one semi-romantic bed scene - between King and Queen (then prince and princess) in flashbacks. Where they just kissed, started undressing (without flashing more than we've seen before in standard sageuks, really), kissed some more... aaand camera panned out to the outside of their tent. Which made me wonder if that was a deliberate attempt to visually draw stark contrast between their clearly loving intimacy and brutal soulless copulating everyone else in the story indulged in. Critique of gratuitous violence against women still stands, but I mean, that's the show which starts with entirety of royal court conspiring to force a woman into obviously unwanted divorce from the husband she loves - or get rid of her in even more nefarious way, if needed - simply because that's beneficial to said court politically. Hardly the time and place to expect any human rights, I'm afraid.

But yes, writing IS weak, pace is not good, directing is clearly obsessed with "we are a grim and dark period show, not your vanilla romcom fusion sageuk!" approach to the point that it becomes unintentionally funny (capital is somehow as sunless and fugly as dreaded Deadly North royal couple spent their most happy years in) and I expected much more from Queen's performance as adult (but liked teen actress, what's her name btw?). Other actors did well enough, but when everything else is pretty mediocre at best... Overall I doubt this drama will earn any beans from me - with exception of "too much skinship" one perhaps^^

19
12
reply

Required fields are marked *

"...directing is clearly obsessed with "we are a grim and dark period show, not your vanilla romcom fusion sageuk!" approach to the point that it becomes unintentionally funny...."

Yeah, I also think that so many things were shown and done solely to be edgy. At least if some of the scenes made sense. The main focus should be on writing a compelling story.

I'm not opposed to dark stories and dark scenes. Even nudity can be done in a more tasteful way. What I saw here, however, didn't feel organic.

I do like the contrast you made between the sexual encounters and the love scene between the King and Queen when they were younger.

5
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

I meant "between the sexual encounters of other characters and the love scene...."

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Writing a compelling story is eternal struggle for any genre and age rating. Not sure these particular writers tried very hard tho...

Despite all script flaws I did feel bad for royal couple - you can see that even with the poor conditions they lived in on that northern border and lack of children they were still rather happy together. Unfortunately, nothing nice ever lasts when throne is involved.

6
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Yes, if only they could have stayed over there in relative peace.

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

I really like your point about the love scene between the King and Queen, which, as you said, was definitely understated in comparison to all the other sexual scenes, perhaps to make a deliberate contrast.

About the shaman scene: I only watched it once (and please don't ask me to do so again, lol) but my memory is that only Rachel or Monica popped out, more like a wardrobe malfunction than anything else. That is, it didn't feel like a full-on embrace of what may or may not be a historical reality (that shamans performed some or all of their rituals in the nude) but more like a brief introduction to the fact that this is a sensual character who is clearly not boxed in by the sexual mores of the day. Just like a lot of other things in the show, it was done in a clumsy way that ended up feeling a bit icky even if it is based in some sort of historical precedent.

4
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Can this be really called a wardrobe malfunction when a piece of clothes that's supposed to be worn tied/buttoned was just not?)))

But yes, shamans are indeed above/beyond commoners' morals and proprieties, so, while the scene could've been indeed done better, it was nothing too extra. Some of her following actions though... Wonder if we'll see this character again or get more info about her and her motives in Part2.

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

I haven't read anything about naked shamans in Korean history, either. LOL
The way shamans were portrayed in JUMONG (the first king of Goguryeo) to some extent and Kim Go-eun in EXHUMA seemed to follow the traditional way of divination and exorcism.
In early Goguryeo, the place of worship (forgot the word for it) for the Shamans was considered sacred, and no one was allowed inside, not even the king. The writers of JUMONG probably took this concept and depicted their shamans as pure individuals. Those who were impure were expelled, and severe punishments were given to anyone caught inside the sacred place. However, Queen Woo is portrayed as the opposite. It seems that erotic behavior is the fuel for the head shammy.

1
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

I've read a book few days ago extra boring day, randomly picked one from home library - Eva Wong's "The Shambhala guide to Taoism" in case anyone's interested - and it had a bit of intro explaining religious beliefs/mysticism in China before Taoism was a thing, shamanism included. No naked gals either iirc))) But it did mention how there were always multiple schools with often opposing views on rituals, methods and what's considered sacred, including sexual practices, so perhaps it wasn't all the same in Ancient Korea either? At least before Joseon happened - we all know any possible fun ended for good right then and there)))

1
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Thanks for the book recommendation. After watching THE LONGEST DAY IN CHAN'AN, I've been interested in learning more about Taoism.

I don't think it was one size fits all, either. From what I read, the Shamans in the northern regions (Goguryeo) are thought to have engaged with the spirit world via possession brought about by ecstatic dancing leading to trance, while those in the south (Backje and Silla) communicated with the spirits via hereditary dances and rituals passed down in shaman families.
Besides Shamanism, there was Animism and Totemism, which seems to be the belief system of the White Tiger tribe. Totemism is described as groups or tribes of humans who are believed to have kinship or a mystical relationship with a spirit being, such as a particular type of animal or plant (from McBride's book The 3 Kingdoms of Korea).

3
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

You'll probably like the book - it even takes time to throw shade on xianxia tropes regarding cultivation)))

Totemism is the most interesting one, isn't it? Having your ancestry start from a shapeshifting beast - with other supernatural abilities for a good measure - is a peak cool! Even if you cannot really prove it other than using violence to make skeptics agree with you. Is that the reason for all that "worshiping sky" talk in a drama and feathers for a crown? And Queen has a pet falcon (?)...

2

Samantha and Rachel lol!

I personally didn't see that JCW scene as objectifying him because of how sexualised and demeaned the women were in contrast to him, but I agree with your comparison of the king and queen's bed scene against the rest. Clearly loving intimacy versus brutal soulless copulating, indeed! I can see how the contrast was likely the show's intention, though I wish it didn't go as far as it did in objectifying women. I'm not expecting women's rights from the time period, but I was hoping the show would be more respectful and sensitive towards women — especially given its subject matter (queen at the center of it all) and the current social climate. Oh well.

The actress for teen Woo Hee is Song Shi-an, I liked her performance too! ^^

3
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Well, he WAS using these women as tools to achieve his goal (btw, why were they blindfolded - he was such a loyal husband he didn't want anyone except wifey to even look at his body? how kdrama-ish lol!), that's a fact. I do feel like show is not going enlightened route with its plot or message (is there even any?) - Queen will likely remain the only significant female character with somewhat positive portrayal. I mean, her sister is a cliche power hungry vain seductress with terminal lack of brain, shaman is a shameless manipulative spy/assassin and that other lady, well... I just gave up expecting much depth in any aspect from this drama very early on, I guess)))

TY! Both teen leads were good despite minimal screentime - again, if only their part was longer...

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

I didn't enjoy the drama "my dearest S1" level but I did like it, I liked the politics (it was in some aspects confusing tho, for example I can't understand why Yeonbi is trying to help Queen Woo? Doesn't she want the crown for herself? 🤔), I liked king and queen past stories and their characters and I liked the story of how she should complete her Misson in 24 hours ( times like this I am fascinated by how tiny of a country is Korea, in my country you can't get pass the next city with a carriage overnight.)
I prepared myself for some GOT level sex scenes so the scenes were not shocking to me but they were unnecessary and not even well displayed, plus Balgi killing for sports scenes were so unnecessary and exaggerated too, I could do without them.
All in all it wasn't a total disappointment imo, and I'm looking forward to the part 2, but it's nothing that I'd recommend to others as a really good kdrama!

6
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Thank god I didn't watch it with my family. 🤣 I think the sex scenes and nudity in this are not as offensive as in Somebody with Kim Young-kwang (dropped it at ep 3 or 4) or felt out of place as in Squid Game. Jeon Jong-seo is so pretty. And I screamed when Ji Chang-wook got killed in ep 1, Oppaaaa..... he was not in the drama's press conference! He could be just an guest appearance! But hey .... there he is on next episodes 😍

2
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I want to say first that I found these first four episodes to be largely gripping and exciting, with an interesting narrative structure, strong performances, and suspenseful tone that makes for a compelling watch. And I want to urge others who aren't immediately turned off by the presence of graphic sex and violence to watch at least the first episode and make up your own mind. Of course, if graphic sex and violence absolutely aren't your bag under any circumstances, then by all means skip this one, because even though some aspects of this show are objectively worthy of praise, they're not so outstanding and unique that you need to suffer through the other parts you're certain to hate.

I already discussed my reaction to some of the sex and sexuality in the drama in the recap post, so I don't want to be repetitive. I did find some of it to be gratuitous in the sense that with the exception of the rather tame and quite lovely mini-love scene between the King and Queen in ep. 2, none of it really advanced the plot or characters in any meaningful way. Additionally, some of the violence also fits that definition, especially the scenes of Go Bal-ki taking distinct pleasure in brutally torturing and murdering his subjects. Yes, that technically showed us what kind of sadist he is, just as various other scenes showed us that the shaman, for example, sees no issue with exploiting or manipulating others' desires for her own (sometimes sexual) gain. But overall, I wouldn't say I thought the show's creative team was endorsing any misogyny or extreme sadism; instead, I think the goal is to show the brutality of this world, and the fact that all kinds of desires--for love, sex, and power--cause some to dehumanize others, be they male or female.

And as @kurama said, we do see both men and women owning and expressing their sexuality; in addition, many of the women are shown to be as smart, cunning, and strategic (or moreso) than many of the men. So I can't say I agree with @soltices that what we're seeing is more of the same "women objectified and fetishized on the pretext of making a show “dark,” “gritty,” or “realistic” that continues to be all too common in media.

What I'm seeing instead is a creative team that's clumsy about the integration and use of shocking scenes to move its story along and build its world. Some of it feels organic, intense, and exciting, but a lot of it seems staged and awkward, and some of that leads to objectification of certain characters, the King for one (was it really necessary for us to see the Queen's sister's graphic fantasies about him? I don't think so).

"Queen Woo" seems to be a show that's trying to be complex and nuanced, and sometimes failing, but not one that's indulging in gratuitous violence to titillate its audience in a way that's designed to demean women. That's what I'm seeing so far, anyway. We'll see if I feel that way all the way to the end.

9
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Organic was also a word I used in one of my replies. I agree that the show's writers are trying to depict a very dark and brutal world. In my opinion, however, most of the nudity and sex were not depicted organically. Like they were just thrown in without much thought to adding them seamlessly into the story.

3
reply

Required fields are marked *

The story and acting wasn't extraordinary, but the show was watchable. Very much reminded me of Korean movies that I haven't seen in a long time. I could have done without the excessive sexual scenes.

I haven't seen Ji Chang Wook much recently - I liked his acting here. His character had a little something to it. He was able to show different qualities. He could care for and love his queen, but make no mistake that he will be violent and brutal to his enemies. He tried to play the palace politics even though he was not the initial one to be king. He had a good amount of screen time (extended cameo?).

It was annoying and typical that the spies and betrayers are the ones close to the royal family. I would have liked the queen and king to have been more suspicious. I had prepared for the king to die on the battlefield, but he died from 3 drops of poison (XD;).
The king's man? Minister Song Woo is looking mighty shady. I thought bodyguard Mil Woo would be on the neutral/good side, but he had a suspicious moment when he checked Eul Pa So's burned note. I guess he could be wary of Eul Pa So though.

I could hardly recognize some of the actors. Won Hyun Joon! He makes for a menacing villain anytime! The chasing after the queen in the dark forest was suspenseful and thrilling. And omg, Song Jae Rim! I did not remember him being in this drama and had to do a double take and check if it was really him, haha. He looks like a scary opponent already.

Go Bal Ki is completely evil. No redeeming qualities. The rape scene was SO unnecessary when they had shown his viciousness beforehand.

I didn't read up on the history before watching so I let things play out on screen. I was curious about Yeon Bi whose role was unclear to me. I did read some history after which is likely a spoiler.

Queen Woo did not get much to do during this first half and she was thrown front and center into the politics so hopefully, in the last half, she will have a strong role. And maybe the show can be past all sexual scenes and there can be a focus on the political battle between the queen and the princes.

3
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

I also really like JCW in this role and wish he'd do another sageuk soon. It feels like eons since he's been in one.

In general, I've also appreciated that he's taken on a wide variety of roles in the past few years. I haven't always liked the resulting drama, but his performances have been consistently great.

6
reply

Required fields are marked *

I don't think Yeon Bi's historical background is a spoiler. It makes her role more clear.

She is linked to the first queen of Goguryeo, Soseono, the daughter of Yeon Tabal, who was the king of Jolbon Buyeo.
Jumong or Chumo fled from BukBoyeo as a refugee with his followers, leaving his first wife and a son. Impressed with his talents. King Yeon Tabal allowed his daughter Soseono to marry Jumong. They founded Goguryeo together, but Queen Soseono left Goguryeo with her sons and established Baekje after Jumong's first wife showed up with their firstborn (Yuri), who later became the 2nd king of Goguryeo.
What used to be Jolbon Buyeo is now part of Goguryeo. Yeon Bi wants her ancestor's land back, probably as an independent country from Goguryeo.

4
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Thanks for the info! I read briefly about her, but you've given me more clarity. My bad, I meant I read spoilers about what happened to Queen Woo and the princes. x]

1
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

No problem! I don't think Yeon Bi existed, but the background history of the Jolbon people, their leader Yeon Tabal, and his daughter Soseono, the first queen of Goguryeo, is mentioned in the "History of the Three Kingdoms." There is also a reference to King Yuri's sword in episode 1—the sword that Queen Woo took to the weaponsmith. It's separated in two, and there is a legend behind it. I posted it on my wall if you are interested in reading it.

3
reply

Required fields are marked *

I’ll skip this one as it sounds like a WhollyWeird production and not a K drama sageuk . I kind of miss the torches and the ministers crying Chooona !

2
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I liked it.

I thought it was fast paced and I'm engaged in the story. I do like the actors involved in the drama, and there are a lot of familiar faces playing the support roles.

As I was watching Queen Woo the line from Game of Thrones came to mind...“When you play the game of thrones, you win or you die. There is no middle ground.”

I didn't expect the nudity, but I didn't give it much thought.

3
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

The show was just horrible and I’m not talking about the sex scenes. The lead actress did horrible and spot light was stoles by the king and the prince.

2
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

It sounds like Game of Thrones, except they jumped straight to Season 8.

2
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Thank you so much @solstices for sparing me the watch. It seems like while Western shows and movies - mostly American - are somewhat (a big “somewhat”) improving (or rather taming themselves for the sake of political appropriateness rather than genuine reform) with regards to respecting women on television, Eastern shows are devolving down the destructive path. And I have no tolerance for it. Want to respectfully depict the historical objectification of women? Imply r*** off-screen and show the emotional impacts it has on her in addition to her recovery from such a horrifying event. There is NO reason to show such a traumatic thing on screen. NOTHING will ever convince me that explicit r*** scenes on screen are not gratuitous torture p***. F*** that. Hard pass on this one since I come to Korean dramaland to avoid gratuitous sex not to fall back into the rabbit hole. But unfortunately I am afraid that just as I continue to watch Western shows and movies with gritted teeth and lots of eye-rolls when I am flashed for no good reason, I will start to watch Asian shows in the same manner as it is becoming more and more common.

3
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Episode 1: Meh.

So there was a reason why the only thing people are talking about is nudity/sex scenes. The show is so boring and basic that the "rarely seen in kdramaland" content became the focus.

"QUEEN Woo" but the only memorable thing about the first episode was Ji Chang Wook telling those snakes his wife isn't going anywhere.

They directed this like most movies these days, and that's not a good thing.
I wasn't expecting them to sing Muyiya and make me cry like in SFD or anything, but this episode had zero impact. Just the same old men talking the same old politics.

Also, if you have all your characters scream "I'm good" "I'm bad" "I'm gonna die" "I'll take the crown" "this is my plan" ALL THE TIME. Then what's the point of watching the show? They really killed any suspense, or excitement in one episode. They even made the king's death feel so pointless and empty.

They started with all the drama and tragedy but made you feel nothing about it...

Conclusion: someone get Park Chan Wook to film a remake and I'll watch that instead.

5
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Yes, the nudity and sex scenes were anything but erotic which would have made them worthwhile watching. The court ladies caressing the king and wiggling their barely covered bottoms looked really bored and tired.

But the violent 3rd prince scenes were even worse. What a pity, Lee Soo-hyuk is capable of making violent scenes look almost sexy, as he did in Scholar who walks the night. The production is lacking in a big way.

3
reply

Required fields are marked *

Hi, thanks for the write up @solstices. And taking your time so we won't have to! So disappointing, I've been looking forward to this one for awhile but it is getting terrible reviews all over the place and for all the same reasons you have named. I have to say, a NC17 warning does not bother me, I have less of a problem with sex than with violence. That being said, it has to add to the story, not detract from it, make up for poor writing or exploiting women for the sake of exploitation. Which is sounds like this show does all three, with graphic violence as well. Thanks for the heads up.

2
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Comment was deleted

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

All right, finally done. Another bean on its way into my kitty.

It was dark. I couldn’t tell who was who. By the time I did, the episodes had ended. There was a love story, but it was as obtuse as the lackluster lovemaking that panned out to the top of a tent. There was a political story, but it sank as clumsily as those bodies in the pond. There was a cohesive narrative waiting for justice somewhere, but it was hung to death as grotesquely as those corpses from the trees.

Everything was always dark. Everything screamed, "Hey, I am gritty and violent, FEEL me." Every female character was either wriggling a head or a butt that had been stripped of its decency.

The King needed to show he was pushing 'the love of his life' away for her own good by having half a dozen half-naked women frolic on him. Got it. Then might as well show the damn stuff. Picking at his shins and shoulders by those said half naked women like they were hunting for bugs while wiggling their bored bottoms would not be the way a King would have an orgy.

Lee Soo Hyun can crank down the temperature of a screen to freezing just by appearing on it. Drowning people in the pool or raping the wife before driving a sword through her was overkill. I have never, ever seen a scene of violence and felt so detached and unaffected.

It was show, show, and more show, with absolutely zero tell. It tried to be Shogun and shot itself in the foot.

Yet, it's a fantastic story. The potential to draw blood, sweat, and tears in a way that mattered would have been so easy in the hands of a good scriptwriter/director. Imagine a powerhouse female lead who changes the course of history in 24 hours.

But the most problematic thing is the casting of Jeon Jong-seo. She is a total misfit. I did like her in the fight scenes, though, but that's about it. The girl shows no depth, which I found surprising because I liked her in WI.

However, JCW is the only one who has put some semblance of heart and effort into the role he was given. He looks good.

So far, the most exciting part for me was thinking Jung Jae-kwang was Sansang, but he isn’t the one.

But this is my bean count watch, and for the time being, I’ve decided to take a hiatus from bubblegums, so I’ll slog through it. Who knows, the next four episodes could be awesome.

4
8
reply

Required fields are marked *

You perfectly expressed some of my thoughts about the show. It lacks depth and is easily forgettable, especially compared to "Shogun" or "The Last Kingdom." Those shows excel at crafting historical fiction from actual history, providing the actors with solid material to work with.

I mentioned this after watching the trailer. Jeon Jong-seo is a good actress, particularly in her first film with director Lee Chang-dong. However, in this sageuk, her lack of experience is evident under this director.

The one character who made an impression on me was Mu Gol, the king's trusted guard. He convincingly portrayed the battle-hardened warrior and looked and acted the part. I'm pleased that he is one with a main role.

I have one more episode left to watch for a bean, or is it half a bean? 😂

6
7
reply

Required fields are marked *

half 🤣

'The one character who made an impression on me was Mu Gol'

Yes, he is good too. But given all he has had to do is to stand in the dark with hands folded before him, and look sagacious, I am, while suitably appreciative, not quite bowled over. Hopefully he has more to do in the upcoming episodes.

2
6
reply

Required fields are marked *

He treats the queen as the late king's equal and allows her to make decisions as their leader. He is more concerned with keeping her alive than making it to their destination on time.
I hope he lives long enough to do more. LOL

1
5
reply

Required fields are marked *

Sorry, I mixed the characters up. I thought you were speaking about Eul Paso. My bad.

Yes, Mu Gol. He is a great character, and probably the best fleshed out character. That is his biggest brownie point ❤️❤️❤️ A true blue feminist in the dark wild east.

0

@minniegupta1,

No problem. I'm familiar with the historical figures but lost with the new characters.

Eul Paso isn't as strategic as I thought he would be. You know, one step ahead of his opponents. He looks cool when he uses the water clock, though. LOL

1

Yes. His 'just be alive anyway you can' was like - really?

It's such a shoddily written script. Who advises their best friend king to have orgies to push away your best friend Queen....I mean, this is not even lazy writing, it's just bad. One would have hard time writing a chapter on this, I don't know how they sat and wrote a script with live actors in it with a scene like this, which was not even executed properly.

2

That was a sorry attempt at creating an unnecessary love triangle.

A queen's life wouldn't be in danger if the king died. She'd take on another royal role as the queen dowager.

If all these sex scenes were to show that women have desires, why stop there? What's wrong with a queen who desires power? There is a reason why she is the only one in Korean history to be a queen consort twice.

4

The interpretation is so cliche, it's sad. This had such a potential - a morally ambiguous Queen, not necessarily bad, but human, and a King who was a brave warrior but a product of his times.

After her death she chose to be buried next to her second husband. I found that bit interesting. In fact, she even tried to kill the woman who had sex with her second husband, but didn't because that woman became pregnant. So a possessive woman who took such a bold step to secure the crown for herself - I would have loved to see that story.

5

Thank you for the recap, @solstices!
I finally made it to eps 4, ff through unnecessary crap.
I still think Prince Crocodile Tears (Yeon-woo) will be her next husband because Gye-soo is a Nam-mu fanboy and Goguryeo loyalist. I don't see him betraying his idol by marrying his sister-in-law. He is also married, and he doesn't seem to be ruthless like Balgi.

The last vision with the 5 crows on the throne kind of makes sense—the war between the 5 tribes has already started.
I also want to know how it ends, so I'll tune in for the 2nd part.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Baek Hyun Woo's parents in Queen of Tears

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *