Kdrama PPL makes it to the Arts pages of the New York Times. It’s peppered with references, but they missed out on some of the best. No Dyson. No TKEM. No Be Melodramatic: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/14/business/media/subway-product-placement-korea.html
I certainly considered the former (and think it’s very likely true – what are the odds of a brand name appearing in the headline of a news article), though not the latter.
2
0
Modal title
Modal title
Modal title
Modal title
A verification email has been sent to your new email address.
Please click the link in that email to complete the email change process.
Modal title
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit,
sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna
pickleddragon
March 14, 2021 at 8:03 AM
Kdrama PPL makes it to the Arts pages of the New York Times. It’s peppered with references, but they missed out on some of the best. No Dyson. No TKEM. No Be Melodramatic: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/14/business/media/subway-product-placement-korea.html
mmmmm
March 14, 2021 at 8:30 AM
This is such a let-down. Talking about Kdrama PPL without mentioning either Dyson or TKEM is just wrong. So wrong.
Lord Cobol (Kdramas, like water, flow downhill)
March 14, 2021 at 11:35 AM
A true cynic might ask whether Subway paid to be featured in the article or Dyson paid to not be mentioned.
mmmmm
March 14, 2021 at 7:27 PM
*bows*
Very impressive assumptions.
pickleddragon
March 15, 2021 at 1:03 AM
I certainly considered the former (and think it’s very likely true – what are the odds of a brand name appearing in the headline of a news article), though not the latter.