17

[Drama special review] The Reason for Our Breakup

Two divorcees navigate post-marriage dating while juggling some unwieldy baggage in this O’PENing drama special. With a subtle script and the plainest of production design, the drama tells a simple story that’s all about subtext, but its core message stays just a little too far out of sight.

 
DRAMA SPECIAL REVIEW

Breakup is a strong word for the title of this story (which might be better translated as “One Reason We Can’t Meet”), since this couple never really gets together, not in earnest anyway. We’re introduced to our leads in the opening sequence where they’re seated at a table, going through the motions of a public breakup — and then we learn it’s the first day they’ve met. The setup: here are two people with commitment issues.

But as the story goes on we find out exactly what’s holding them back. KIM KI-JOON (Kang Sang-joon) is twice divorced and still blaming himself for his cheating ex-wife’s unhappiness. His mother (a cameo by the lovely Seo Jung-yeon) really wants him to remarry, even though she herself is miserable in her own marriage (“If your father died? Oh, then I’d be free,” she laughs to her son).

On the other side of our couple equation, we have a single mom, JUNG WON-YOUNG (Uee), who prior to her divorce thought marriage was forever. In a moving flashback, we see her ex-husband say he wants to end it, only to have her laugh it off and exclaim, “We can’t breakup. We’re married.”

He’s quite serious, though, and the next thing she knows she and her pre-school-aged son are on their own. In the whirlwind of it all, she quits her office job and gets a part-time gig at a café, where her younger co-worker schools her on the current ways of the dating world. These days, young people live together without any intent of marrying and they break up when they want to. It’s not a big deal.

When Won-young and Ki-joon meet, they sleep together on the first day (the same day we met them “breaking up”), but in a confusing timeline they randomly run into each other again a year later and take up where they left off. Heeding the advice of her co-worker, Won-young speaks to the camera, telling us that now divorcees in their 30s can sleep with people they don’t want a relationship with — though I get the feeling she’s mostly trying to convince herself.

The device of speaking to the camera is used consistently with Won-young breaking the fourth wall to give us (what are meant to be) comedic interjections. She’s the only one with an awareness of our presence and stops mid-conversation with other characters to clue us in to what she’s thinking. The side effect is that we hardly ever get to see her react to a situation. Instead, we’re told how she feels, which flatlines the emotional resonance (and the humor just isn’t witty enough to make up for it). All this makes it hard to connect with the characters, even as I understand their plight.

With some choppy editing, we learn that after their second meeting Won-young and Ki-joon have continued to sleep together regularly — but they never really get to know each other — until one day Won-young suggests they move in together. She’s rejected (Ki-joon doesn’t want either of them to have to change for the relationship), which leads to more internal dilemmas of “what to do.” Why these two are so drawn to each other, or what they actually like about each other, remains a mystery as we see them worry, argue, and rationalize about how to move on post-divorce. They’re trying to force an endgame without actually (re)playing the game.

This is especially apparent in the drama’s strongest scene, close to the end, when we finally meet Won-young’s son. It’s his birthday and Won-young has invited Ki-joon to a restaurant to celebrate, just the three of them. Ki-joon arrives quite late, which leads to an argument, and it’s the five-year-old who cuts them off and acts like the most mature person at the table.

Afterward, Won-young cries in the car as her son quietly and patiently sits in the backseat. She apologizes for forgetting about him and making him feel bad on his birthday. Here, we’re finally allowed to see her react and it’s much more affecting than all the earlier scenes where she explains her feelings to the camera. One earlier moment that doesn’t hit right is when she admits to a friend that she completely forgot about her son when she asked Ki-joon to move in with her — and it’s played for laughs. Luckily, in the car, we see how much she’s truly grappling with, by trying to be a mom and also get on with her love life.

The birthday dinner marks a turning point for Won-young, who decides to get back to the corporate world and also to try dating Ki-joon for real. Rather than forcing it and worrying about the ending, they actually spend some time in each other’s lives. He helps her prep to reenter the fulltime workforce and gets to know her son by taking care of him while she’s at work. And the budding couple goes on dates to the aquarium and the botanical garden, smiling and holding hands. All seems to be going well, until it’s time to talk about the future again. When they finally contend with their baggage, they each have a clear picture of what they want in life, but heartbreaking as it is those visions don’t match up.

Overall, this drama gives me the feeling that something is missing. I see the story it wants to tell — about divorcees, still wounded, afraid but wanting to move on. But it’s trying to tell that story with such exacting subtlety that it leaves out some essential components, like raw emotion. The lines feel like they’re being read off a page and until the moment when Won-young breaks down in the car, I had trouble believing this woman went through a tumultuous breakup or struggled with caring for a child. Her flippancy and repartee seem like that of a young person who hasn’t yet been battered by life — which doesn’t mesh with the painful subtext of the story.

The frame is in place for a thoughtful modern take on divorce (I mean, when’s the last time you saw a lead divorced multiple times?), but without some meaty emotion to grip onto, the frame remains a bit hollow. With less exposition in the moments of interaction — and a little more information between the transitions — this could have been a soulful story. As it stands, while the reason for their breakup may be clear, I’m still not totally sure why they were together.

 
RELATED POSTS

Tags: ,

17

Required fields are marked *

@dramaddictally: Thank you for this review.
I would like to see this despite its dramatic shortfalls as I like that it doesn’t pretend that people don’t sleep together in SK while dating but tries to grapple with the realities of modern life. The conservative agenda pervasive in so many KDs which presents people as characters who are so shocked when they are kissed and behave as though they don’t have any connection with the RL is just unrealistic and laughable.
Now, off to try and find this!

6
10
reply

Required fields are marked *

I manage to find it on Daily Moti*n and watched it then and there. I like the leads but 66 minutes is arguably not long enough to get to the core of why they liked each other. I wish it could be 2 hours so the story could establish how they were drawn to each other beyond an initial 1NS.
Alternatively, if I were the director, I would have edited some of the redundant scenes like the opportunistic mother and just mentioned quickly how predatory people could be. I would also cut down on the coffee shop scenes but keep the chat with the younger co-worker as well as pairing down on the breaking the 4th wall scenes. The leds were likeable and I would have liked to see them be raw and vulnerable with each other.
As I wanted more of scenes with Jini, I would have transitioned between the scenes quicker and cut the scenery shots.
All and all, I don’t regret seeing this at all.

6
reply

Required fields are marked *

I respectfully submit to you a different point of view. For many of us "Westerners", immersing ourselves in a culture that still places the concepts of decency, purity, kindness, morality and respect at its center is truly a breath of fresh air.

10
8
reply

Required fields are marked *

👍

3
reply

Required fields are marked *

i agree 100%. if you need sex to make the story appealing, then it's pure crap.

5
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

I’d counter that it’s pure crap if you think a story is unappealing because it contains sex.

7
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

I’ve been reflecting on my somewhat snarky comment (above), which in retrospect I don’t think is conducive to meaningful and respectful conversation.

@antonio83 - I’m glad that you’ve found some Korean programming that reflects the values that are important to you. But I hope you’ll consider that not everyone shares your values, and not everyone is looking to get the same thing from a drama as you are.

I like to watch dramas that represent the real world: messy, complicated, and morally complex. Shows that challenge as well as entertain. Shows that sometimes make me uncomfortable. Quite often that includes content that I believe you would find offensive. But no one is forcing you to watch it.

Personally, I don’t enjoy watching many of the more “family-friendly” shows. I can have some pretty strong negative opinions about them, but I try to keep them to myself out of respect for those who love them. After all—nobody is forcing me to watch them, either.

One of the main reasons I joined the Beanie community is the mutual respect we show each other, even when we strongly disagree. Loaded words like “decency,” “purity,” and “morality” make Dramabeans an uncomfortable place, at least for me. I hope you’ll avoid this kind of language if you decide to continue posting on this site.

7

that's NOT what i meant. what i said is, if sex is the most interesting thing in the story, it's crap. that's just bad storytelling if you can't make an intelligent story without naked people.

1

There are many ways to tell a story. Some authors, screenwriters, directors, etc. make the creative choice to incorporate sex and nudity—not because they don’t have the ability to tell the story without them—but rather because it’s part of their overall artistic vision. Whether or not to agree with or like that vision should be up to the individual viewer to decide. One person’s crap is another person’s masterpiece. I personally find The Sound of Music to be mawkish claptrap, but I’d never judge or disparage someone else for loving it. I’d hope others would afford me the same consideration and not be so quick to condemn something I might cherish.

1

I watch KDramas because I like the way the stories are told. Purity is absolutely unimportant to me, rather I usually roll my eyes in disbelief when the makers try to tell me that adult, healthy people have no desire or need for physical closeness.

11
reply

Required fields are marked *

Positioning decency, kindness and respect alongside purity implies only the chaste can have those qualities. Last I checked, plenty of chaste folks on dramas were nasty, immoral people. Have you seen a makjang recently? And thank god for that. I need my dramas to have drama. 😂

Further, may I gently ask Westerners to reconsider their orientalist perspective. No society’s values are monolithic and unchanging. To paint it as that and bemoan all change is too simplistic. And mightn’t some change be a good thing? Otherwise, would women have been even allowed to act on stage? Would everyone still be dressed in hanboks… Wait, that might actually be cool. 😂

Of course, I’m making a little light of this. But it’s a complex subject that deserves a more nuanced take than that blanket statement allows.

7
reply

Required fields are marked *

Finally a review on One Reason We Can't Meet. I liked it so much I went to pen my thoughts on my fanwall the exactly a month and a day ago.

When I watched it, I loved it. It brought me to tears cause I had myself wondering what exactly that one reason was. This are two people who got to know each other well after drama in between and it was really cool seeing Won-young finally relax and breathe.

Her son is a marvelous one. Add in sweet. He provided many poignant scenes in the drama for me.
In the mix of all this was sweet adorable Ji-Ni bearing the brunt of the adults falling in love and, breaking apart. I can picture the strength it took for him to warm up to Uncle Ki-joon and the hurt he felt when Uncle Ki-joon stopped showing up. Were Uncle Ki-joon beside me in that moment where he lovingly asks Won-young with this resigned dejected look if Uncle Ki-joon was going to come today, I’d have sent something was than a death glare his way. I can’t believe they both forgot they were being parents to this young child as they were working their issues. If anything, I’ll treasure the scene where Ki-joon called out to him after daycare this particular day that got all heads rolling and Ji-Ni walking down in pride.(I rewatched this scene more than 5 times.) Or is it me seeing a father figure correctly and properly bribe a child for the first time in a long while in kdramas without having to make false promises or statements.(This one was so so good.) And that’s a testament to how matured - just as you termed it Dramaddictally - Ji-Ni was and how much he grew on me in the short time I spent with him.

At the end of it all I had to agree that not only do I understand, I see reasons why they can't meet. And it only makes it hurt more.

4
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Charming. To remove comments noting that a person makes homophobic and other bigoted comments but leave their fetishised view of SK intact. Well done Drama Bean. This is what I call one helluva moderation.

4
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

I think views if “respectfully submitted” and framed are fine, no matter how regressive they may be. But calling out a person is a no-no? I know, I know…

However, my response, based on the argument alone, was also removed. It might have been as it was rolled under the thread. I can repost to check tho I don’t remember exactly what I said.

4
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

Your good response was removed also because they removed the entire thread.
That person has repeatedly posted homophobic, sexist and vile stuff and DB has never removed their posts. Yesterday’s was no exception. Fake courtesy plus fetishised and regressive gendered views equals an acceptable post in DB’s moderation policy. But heaven forbid if bigots get called out on this website. It really galls me because this person has been empowered to continue making such offensive and regressive comments by such a moderation policy.

5
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Oh yes, it’s been directed at me as well. However, it was such a hilariously antiquated comment, I pictured some Victorian gentleman twirling his mustache (or some matron fanning herself) and telling young ladies—behave! 😂 But it was targeted at me *personally* so I was surprised that DB let it slide. So it does seem like a bit of a double standard. Or maybe admins didn’t see it. Who knows.

At that time, I did check DB policy. And nowhere does it say no sexism, racism, homophobia, etc. Sometimes, based on the comments and recappers, you might get the impression this is a progressive site, but it is not. Look at the number of likes the original comment got. Clearly, people want 35-year-olds giving dead fish kisses even if they’ve been married and have children—evidence you know of 🤫 sex.

That said, compared to the rest of the Internet, DB is generally a more civilized space where you don’t have to constantly check if some MRA is waiting to jump on your comment. So, I guess we take what we can get.

I only wish we got more in depth, more thoughtful critiques because there are valid arguments to be made. At the very least, instead of the same ol cut-and-paste response, let’s talk about what role sex plays in the drama. But I also wish to be tall enough to carry off Rowoon’s beautiful belted coat-bok, and that ain’t happening either. 😀

8
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Exactly. You are dead right. As you hopefully know by now, I’m not a humourless drone and like fun banter with you wonderful Beanies but I care strongly about human rights and will not compromise on them or stay silent.
This site’s main interest is clicks and advertising for sure so am not labouring under any illusions.
Let’s have thought provoking and hopefully fun discussions for as long as we can.

5