God’s Gift – 14 Days: Episode 2
by solabelly
Hello! I’m solabelly, and I’ll be joining the God’s Gift recapping team. A big thank you to javabeans and girlfriday for this amazing opportunity, and a big thanks and hello to all the readers! Please give me a while to figure out all the ins-and-outs of this blogging thing. I promise to try my best!
This episode is full of suspense, mystery, and action sequences worthy of any blockbuster movie. Plus, the feels! So many feels! Mostly of the ow-my-heart variety, but still, so good! As our heroine races to try to save her young daughter’s life, we get way more questions than answers in our whodunit mystery, and discover that people aren’t always what they seem.
EPISODE 2 RECAP
In a tension-filled TV studio, people are in shock as our serial killer taunts the public and the police over live TV, laughing that they’ll never catch him. The host shakily asks how they know for certain that he is who he says he is, since his voice has obviously been altered (creepily). The killer laughs and gives a specific detail concerning the number of stab wounds on his second victim, which Detective Woo-jin confirms.
The killer continues, saying that despite already murdering three women, he’s bored of it and wants to try something new. He then tells someone to speak into the phone and the voice of a scared little girl calls out for her mom. Soo-hyun freezes as she recognizes her daughter’s voice.
As she runs through the studio to grab the phone, the killer next taunts the president, threatening that this little girl will die because of him. By the time Soo-hyun reaches the phone, the killer has already hung up, and people all across the city watch the live broadcast in disbelief.
At the same time, the president is catching up with his son and young family, who are visiting from abroad. Both the president and his wife want their son to return to Korea, but the son demurs. An aide interrupts and turns on the TV. As the president sees the news of Saet-byul’s kidnapping, his face turns grim.
Back at the studio, Woo-jin questions Saet-byul’s nanny and Mina, the assistant that was watching Saet-byul at the time of her disappearance. Neither of them saw anything suspicious. The police then check the building’s CCTVs and Soo-hyun cries as she spies her daughter’s last recorded moments, happily running toward her nanny.
Back at their home the next day, Soo-hyun and her husband Ji-hoon wait by the phone hoping the kidnapper will call. Woo-jin and his team of detectives surround them, having set up base in their living room.
Woo-jin suggests that Ji-hoon be the one to answer the call, and coaches him on how to keep the kidnapper talking long enough so that the police can trace the call. In a daze, Soo-hyun dejectedly wonders if the kidnapper will actually contact them. His motives were political, not about money, weren’t they?
The phone rings. Ji-hoon answers and that same altered voice demands 2 billion won by 2 PM the next day. Full of emotions, Ji-hoon berates the caller. How does he know if this is the real kidnapper? How does he know if his daughter is still alive? Until he gets to speak to her, he says that he won’t negotiate, and hangs up.
The cops shake their heads in disappointment and Soo-hyun freaks out, crying that if he’s angered the kidnapper and he kills Saet-byul, it’ll be all his fault.
The phone rings again, and this time Soo-hyun answers. She asks if Saet-byul is all right, if she’s alive, and says that she’ll pay the ransom. The altered voice just repeats that he wants 2 billion won delivered by the next day and hangs up. The cops sigh in frustration again, saying that the trace was unsuccessful.
Later, two detectives take a break outside, scoffing that the killer was just bluffing about this kidnapping being a political act; it was about money after all. The eavesdropping security guard butts in, asking if the kidnapper really did call demanding ransom, making the off-handed comment that this family had that other strange money issue in the past as well. The detectives’ ears perk up at that last bit, and they ask him to clarify.
Which leads to, of course, Dong-chan getting stopped by the detectives on his way home. He gets pushed into a waiting cop car, with no idea why.
Back at the house, the police prepare Ji-hoon for the ransom exchange, while Soo-hyun sits in her daughter’s room, thinking back to happier times.
It flashes us back to a cute exchange where Soo-hyun had found a handmade “wedding picture” of Saet-byul and her celebrity crush, Te-ho, lead singer of the band Snake. Mortified, Saet-byul had chastised her mom for going through her things, vowing to put a lock on her private box.
Soo-hyun stares at that same box now and tries to open the little lock to no avail. Downstairs, Ji-hoon, Woo-jin and the other detectives wait for the kidnapper to call. But instead of the phone, someone rings the doorbell.
It’s a package for Soo-hyun. Ji-hoon goes up to tell her to sign for it, asking if she remembers ordering anything. She doesn’t, but heads downstairs anyway. Hm, suspicious.
Under the watchful eye of ALL the detectives (ha), a nervous delivery man gets Soo-hyun’s signature and hands her her package. When both their hands are holding onto the bottom of the box, he discreetly taps her finger to alert her to his actual delivery: a small note.
While the cops are busy inspecting the box, she goes upstairs to read the ransom note. It states all the obvious: the kidnapper wants her to ditch the cops, and come to a park near the Han River for the ransom exchange.
Woo-jin comes in just then, and Soo-hyun hides the note while he apologizes for being so strict with police procedure and tells her to get some rest.
Later, Soo-hyun makes her way downstairs and faints in front of everyone, and gets rushed to the hospital. But when Ji-hoon goes to check on her, he finds the hospital bed empty. I knew it!
Soo-hyun sneaks out to the bank and frantically stuffs stacks of money into a paper bag. She’s so frazzled that people stare, and when she runs out the door, a bank manager calls the police…
…Which is how Woo-jin and his team are able to catch up to her as she makes her way to the park. They’re already set up to keep watch over the situation as Soo-hyun scans the park for the kidnapper. A hidden phone rings, and Soo-hyun fishes it out of the garbage and answers it, only to have the kidnapper scream that he told her to ditch the cops.
Soo-hyun swears that she came alone, but spies Woo-jin and the other detectives nearby, and immediately starts apologizing and begging for another chance. The kidnapper tells her to head to the neighboring subway station and jump on a train to lose the cops. She takes off running, and the detectives scramble to chase after her.
She slides under turnstiles like a pro and manages to jump on the train just seconds before the doors close behind her, leaving Woo-jin panting on the platform. He spots her through the window just as the train pulls away. Soo-hyun is instructed to get off at the next stop, and as she exits the train, the kidnapper tells her to stop moving and wait right where she is.
He then tells her to turn around slowly. And there, across the tracks, stands a man dressed in black, his hand covering the mouth of a young girl so that she can’t cry for help. Saet-byul!
The kidnapper then tells Soo-hyun to head back up the stairs to meet in the hallway connecting the two station platforms. She complies, and once there, the kidnapper approaches. Alone.
The man comes closer and grabs the bag of money from Soo-hyun’s hands. Once he disappears down the subway steps, Soo-hyun runs toward the other platform. Saet-byul is still standing there, her back to her. Soo-hyun runs to her and whirls the girl around…
Only, it’s not Saet-byul! Soo-hyun stands there in shock, as the random young girl just looks up at her and cries.
Finally snapping to attention, Soo-hyun spins around and runs after the kidnapper. He’s her only lead! She can’t let him escape! He jumps on a train, and she manages to just barely get on before the doors close. She only has until the next stop to find him on the packed train, and pushes through the crowd with increasing panic.
Just as the train pulls into the next stop, she finally pushes her way into the first car and catches up to the kidnapper. She grabs him just in time.
She hurls herself onto his legs as he tries to exit the train car, and they both stumble onto the platform. Other commuters just stare as the kidnapper kicks and punches Soo-hyun brutally to get her off of him. But she won’t let go, and clings to him with frightening determination, all the while screaming for her daughter. It is… intense.
The cops finally catch up to them, and the kidnapper gets put into handcuffs as Soo-hyun collapses into Woo-jin’s arms.
Meanwhile Dong-chan is released from jail, griping that the cops have nothing better to do than harass him. He stops to look at Saet-byul’s Missing Child poster, and sighs that he hopes she’s okay.
Later at home, he turns on the TV to see a news story about the death of a familiar face: that crazy homeless grandpa who kept bothering him. Dong-chan is surprised to hear that the old man is dead, but gets an even bigger shock when the news reports that this man was actually CHU BYUNG-HO, a rich CEO who in death donated his entire fortune of 10 billion won to charity.
Recalling that that was the exact amount that the old man had promised Dong-chan in exchange for turning his life around, Dong-chan begins to connect the dots, and wails at the thought of all the money that could’ve been his.
After getting treated at the hospital, Soo-hyun asks Ji-hoon to take her to the TV studio. Since the people who had tried to extort a ransom out of them were just scam artists looking to make some money, Soo-hyun decides that she needs to try to reach out to the real kidnapper, since he hasn’t tried to contact them even once.
Live, on-air, Soo-hyun addresses the kidnapper from a darkened studio. She apologizes for her show’s segment about him, drawing unwanted attention, and begs him to forgive her–it wasn’t personal, it was just work.
She then describes Saet-byul as a kind and thoughtful child, and apologizes again for disrupting his life, and swears that anything that she has ever said, or anything that her husband has ever said doesn’t mean anything. The president? Psh, they don’t like him, they didn’t vote for him, and they don’t agree with any of his politics. Soo-hyun and her husband, like the rest of Korea she’s sure, agree wholeheartedly with all of the kidnapper’s ideals.
She continues, begging for her daughter, asking him to take her instead, and it is so gut-wrenching and raw. As she falls to her knees and breaks down even more, off-stage Ji-hoon cries, as does everyone else (including me, SOB).
Just then, the news comes in. A bloody shoe and bag believed to belong to Han Saet-byul have been discovered in the woods. As the directors scramble to get the news out of sight, both Soo-hyun and Ji-hoon see the headline scroll across the bottom of the screen. The director tells his staff to cut to something else, but just then, Soo-hyun stands up and addresses the kidnapper once more.
With the cameras still rolling, Soo-hyun vows that if even one hair on her daughter’s head has been messed with, she will follow the killer to hell and rip him to pieces. She’s coming for him, no matter what.
At the same time, Dong-chan sits at a club, drinking away his sorrows over having lost 10 billion won. Next to him, some drunks see Soo-hyun on TV and laugh at her misfortune.
Being a human being with feelings, Dong-chan calls the drunks out on their horrible behavior and it quickly turns into a big fight, with Dong-chan getting dragged outside and pushed up against a large clothes donation bin in the alleyway. Dong-chan’s alone against the four mean drunks, but he gives it his all, saying that he totally needed to relieve some stress today.
Cut to the next morning, and Dong-chan wakes in his bed, completely hung-over. Only when he runs to the bathroom to puke does he notice the blood on his sleeve, and the scrapes on his face. He wonders what happened the night before as bits and pieces of his brawl slowly come back to him.
He curses the drunks for messing with his pretty face (heh), and tries to clean up as best he can. As he throws his bloodied shirt into the wash, his co-workers bang on his front door. As he goes to let them in, the camera pans down again to the bloody sleeve of his shirt, I wonder… whose blood is that?
Dong-chan’s co-workers, Jenny and Byung-tae, laugh at his ability to always find his way home no matter how drunk he gets. They tell him that it’s time to get to work because the cheating husband they’ve been hired to catch is with his girlfriend at a motel right now.
Said couple are indeed in a motel room, and Dong-chan barges in with a camera. He takes picture after picture, until the cheating husband literally jumps on top of him, and they both fall to the ground.
Something in Dong-chan’s back pocket pokes him, and as he fights with the angry husband, he fishes out a little girl’s hair pin and flings it into the large fish tank in the room. Uh-oh. That can’t be good.
Back at Soo-hyun’s house, Woo-jin returns the found items and yes, they belonged to Saet-byul. Soo-hyun silently grabs the bags from Woo-jin and heads upstairs. While she sobs, Woo-jin tells Ji-hoon that he thinks it’s best if they prepare themselves for the worst-case scenario.
It’s early morning, and a lone fisherman on a quiet lake pulls up a little red sneaker. As he sighs, a body bobs up to the surface.
Ji-hoon looks over crime scene photos of a small shack where his daughter was held, as Woo-jin explains how she died. Originally the police thought that she was tossed into the lake after being murdered, but autopsy reports revealed that the cause of death was drowning. Therefore, the police think that Saet-byul fell into the lake and drowned while attempting to escape, a full 7 days after her kidnapping.
Soo-hyun arrives at the crime scene, but falls apart before she even passes through the crowd of reporters and onlookers. Ji-hoon is already past the police tape, and sobs over the body of their dead child.
At a press conference, the president comments on Saet-byul’s murder. He expresses his sadness over her death and vows to do everything in his power to catch the killer. He promised the nation a strong, tough government, and he’s going to show this crazy killer just how strong he and the people of Korea can be. GAME ON.
Before the reporters can ask him for specifics, the president leaves the podium and his Minister of Justice, LEE MYUNG-HAN, addresses the audience. It has been decided: the government will be bringing back the death penalty, and there will be an execution soon. As a wave of surprise runs through the room he continues: he, personally, will choose the death row inmates set for execution.
Dong-chan’s brother Dong-ho quietly sits in his jail cell and looks out the window up at the night sky, while Dong-chan dreams of his tortured past. A man walks through a swamp, carrying the body of a dead woman. As the man drops the body into the swamp, Dong-chan’s voice cries out for his brother to stop.
Next, we see Dong-chan in court, testifying as a witness against his brother. The prosecutor asks him if it’s true that he saw his brother dispose of a dead body, and while his mother and brother both plead with sad eyes, Dong-chan wavers, but in the end answers yes. As the crowd murmurs in shock and his brother looks at him in surprise, Dong-chan wakes up, sweat streaming down his face.
Soo-hyun sits in Saet-byul’s room, going through her daughter’s belongings. She finds the locked box again, but this time, the lock pops open in her hand. A bit surprised, Soo-hyun digs through the box to find it full of pictures of Saet-byul’s crush, Te-oh.
Next Soo-hyun discovers Saet-byul’s diary. As she reads a few entries, tears fall from her face. Inside the little diary, Saet-byul had expressed all of her innermost thoughts, fears and troubles. She discusses being an outcast at school, and how she worries that she isn’t living up to her mother’s expectations of her. She also mentions her friendship with Young-gyu, and her disappointment over how her mother treated her only friend harshly. Overcome with guilt, Soo-hyun closes the diary and apologizes for making Saet-byul feel that way.
Outside the villa, Young-gyu waits for Saet-byul. The pesky guard comes by and tries to tell him to leave, softening a bit and trying to explain that Saet-byul is in heaven now. But Young-gyu doesn’t waver. No, Saet-byul isn’t dead and he’s going to wait for her. Saddened, the guard relents and leaves him in peace.
Soo-hyun wakes from a nap to find Ji-hoon packing up some of Saet-byul’s belongings. They fight, and he argues that they have to move on, and she refuses to discuss anything or let him take away any of Saet-byul’s things.
Ji-hoon storms out of the house for work and calls her to say that he won’t be coming back. He knows how she feels; he lost a child too. And while he knows that it’s not rational and that it’s not really her fault, he can’t help but blame her for Saet-byul’s death. If she hadn’t gone off with her first love that day to reminisce, and had been with Saet-byul the entire time, none of this would have happened. All Soo-hyun can do is cry.
Later at his office, Ji-hoon goes through his mail and opens an envelope. Inside are pictures which aren’t shown to us, but judging from his face, they’re not good.
Dong-chan heads home and gets a call from Jenny. She’s frantic and warns him to run, as it turns out that the woman he slept with the other night while drunk is the wife of a scary mob boss. Dong-chan can’t understand what she’s saying, and then steps inside and runs right into a roomful of thugs and their boss. Mob Boss tells Dong-chan he knows that he slept with his wife, and that now he has to die, adding the complaint: “My wife won’t sleep with me after you because she says sleeping with me is too boring!”
Dong-chan stammers for an excuse and begs for his life, but the gang members just laugh. Dong-chan creates a distraction by throwing the carton of eggs in his hands, and manages to run out of the apartment. He hides in a large clothing donation bin, as the gangsters run around looking for him.
While there, he gets a call from his cop friend, who delivers some terrible news. His brother Dong-ho is set to be executed later today. That stops Dong-chan in his tracks, and the gangsters find him. He sighs into the phone, “There’s nothing to be done.”
Soo-hyun takes a bus back to the lake where Saet-byul drowned, and misses a call from Ji-hoon. He’s also going somewhere in his car, and he leaves her a message. He knows who killed Saet-byul. And he’s going to kill him with his own two hands.
Woah.
Soo-hyun makes it to the small shack that was her daughter’s prison and cries over the cot where her daughter was forced to spend her last days. Soo-hyun wishes she could turn back time, and then walks outside to the lake in a daze.
At the same time, Dong-ho is retrieved from his cell and led to a room with a noose. When he realizes what’s about to happen, he pees his pants and cries out, begging to be saved.
Dong-chan is, by chance, dragged to the very same lake where Soo-hyun is standing. The gangsters tie a cinder block to his feet and tie his hands, ready to throw him to his death.
He begs them to spare his life, and spies Soo-hyun across the way. Dong-chan screams at her to call the police, but Soo-hyun just turns away, lost in her thoughts. She stares at the lake and tells Saet-byul not to worry anymore. She won’t be cold, scared, and alone for much longer. “Mommy’s coming.”
Dong-ho hangs. Dong-chan gets thrown into the lake and gets pulled down by the cinder block. And Soo-hyun takes off her shoes and dives in. She just lets the water envelop her, sinking further and further down all the way to the bottom.
COMMENTS
Um, wow. Just wow. That was kind of intense, huh? Let’s all take a moment to breathe some deep breaths and get back to normal. Phew. This episode did a great job of moving our story along in a smart and suspenseful way, and along with the some beautiful camerawork, it felt just like watching a mini action movie. I’m loving the tone of this drama, which is just very understated and genuine, allowing for all those gut-wrenching emotions to pop even more.
The story is suspenseful and intense, and does a great job with exciting action sequences AND heartfelt emotions. It really is a great mix of both, so that the entire time, I’m just a big ball of nerves. Whether I’m on the edge of my seat as someone chases someone else, or cringing over a beat down (Soo-hyun vs. the fake kidnapper at the train station was kinda hard to watch, yeah?), or sobbing along with a character and their grief, just oof.
At the heart, though, is the emotion. While the action and suspense are great (and also important to this story), what I’m most enjoying is all the different character studies. Take our poor grieving parents, Soo-hyun and Ji-hoon, for example. Ultimately, this is Soo-hyun’s story, but I appreciate how this episode gave us a few moments to see Ji-hoon’s grief too. It’s different from Soo-hyun’s, but that doesn’t mean that it’s any less valid.
I think because he was painted as the perfect husband and father, and has literally been in the background to Soo-hyun’s grief, standing behind the scenes while she let out her angst, it was easy to forget that he also lost his child. So I’m glad the show reminded us that he, too, needed to grieve, and gave him the chance to let out his emotions. When Ji-hoon called Soo-hyun to blame her for their daughter’s death, yes it was mean and hurtful, but it was truthful. He said it himself that he knew it wasn’t rational to blame her, and that he knew it wasn’t really her fault, but he couldn’t help but feel what he felt. It was very honest and real, and showed us that maybe there is something more behind his perfect façade.
So what is behind that façade? Who knows? We got a small glimpse, but again, it gave us more questions than answers. What were those pictures of? Why did they upset Ji-hoon so much? Who sent them? And is this photo-sender really responsible for Saet-byul’s death?
Lee Bo-young, of course, once again knocks it out of the park with her performance. She just gives it her all. So much so that I actually felt Soo-hyun’s desperation and guilt and hope in all that she did. When she went on TV to reach out to the serial killer, she just put it all out there. That wasn’t just one mother’s love and desperation and grief, it was just raw emotion. And I loved how the show played out that scene: with minimal visuals and absolutely no background music. Sob.
Of course, in the end, the ransom kidnapper turned out to be a fake (the first red herring out of many, I’m sure), but did help the show introduce surprise elements in the chase. I’m looking forward to seeing how this show will incorporate the supernatural/magic/Fate element into our story. (Because Dong-ho, Dong-chan, and Soo-hyun can’t all die right now, amiright?)
Obviously, there is some kind of magical or fated connection between Soo-hyun’s family and Dong-chan’s family. But what is it? And will Dong-chan also be given the chance to redeem his life? I hope so, because like the others, his character is very genuine, real, and complex. Sure, he pretends to be… more sleazy than good, but we’ve seen bits and pieces that suggest otherwise. There was obviously some horrible family trauma in the past (Did his brother really murder someone? Or did he just happen to find the body and move it?), that I’m sure we’ll eventually get the answers to.
I mean, I’m sure they’ll give us a zillion questions before they give us the answers, but that’s all part of the fun, right?
RELATED POSTS
- God’s Gift – 14 Days: Episode 1
- Suspense and suspicion abound in God’s Gift teasers
- Cameras roll on time-slip thriller God’s Gift–14 Days
- Kim Yoo-bin and Noh Min-woo join God’s Gift–14 Days
- Baro and Lee Ki-kwang join God’s Gift–14 Days
- Jung Kyeo-woon in talks to join God’s Gift–14 Days
- Leading men lined up for God’s Gift—14 Days
- Jo Seung-woo up to play Lee Bo-young’s leading man
- Lee Bo-young confirms God’s Gift–14 Days
- Lee Bo-young courted for new time slip drama
Tags: Baro, featured, God's Gift – 14 Days, Jo Seung-woo, Jung Kyeo-woon, Kim Tae-woo, Lee Bo-young
Required fields are marked *
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
26 bamsa
March 6, 2014 at 2:16 PM
Is anyone watching the show from viki? I feel like they skipped on some scenes. I don't remember the Dong-Chan had the little girls hair pin.
Loving the intense drama. Thank you for the recap!
Required fields are marked *
ilikemangos
March 6, 2014 at 2:40 PM
It's all there -- i had to go back to that scene as well. It's very easy to miss, considering it happened in a second or 2.
go to : 39:08 - 39:11. He pulls out the strawberry pin from his back pocket and then throws it. there's a slow-mo of it flying in the air.
Required fields are marked *
27 Baek Song-yi
March 6, 2014 at 2:28 PM
This episode left me severely dehydrated. I now also have no nails to speak of.
SO GOOD. I love this drama to a ridiculous extent. Lee Bo-young was quite frankly phenomenal in this episode - it was impossible not to be moved by Soo-hyun. Her desperation as she held onto the fake kidnapper's ankle was heart-rending: I felt that he was most likely a red herring, but how could you not cheer for her as she hung on for grim death onto the slimmest sliver of hope? As for her TV broadcast, it was indescribably good. The way she changed from pleading to threatening (after Saet-byul's things were found) was simply incredible.
I must also say that the plot looks set to be taking us on one heck of a ride. That cliffhanger was outstanding: not one, not two, but three people on the brink of death. And throughout the episode there are so many little details and possible clues slipped in, so many paths to explore. This writer has clearly matured so much during the six years since 'Iljimae' - I cannot believe it is the same person. But writer-nim, you damn well better not stumble at the last hurdle again.
Now for some speculation *rubs hands in glee*. I'm not sure whether I buy that Saet-byul had an accidental death: everything was so well planned that it is difficult to believe she could have escaped. Bless her, she's just not too bright and way *way* too trusting.
I want the kidnapper to be a total wildcard because so far I could not bear for one of the main men to be the culprit. Say the dog sitter, who lives across from a school because he's a paedophile and also enjoys killing little girls. He killed and stuffed the dog to use as bait, so Saet-byul got waylaid as she ran to her nanny in the car park. Or perhaps the Minister of Justice, because he is secretly a serial killer. He committed all the previous murders too, and his pro-capital punishment stance is another manifestation of his bloodthirsty tendencies. He chose Saet-byul to hurt her father, a political opponent. Or maybe it's the rich grandpa - similarly secretly overcome with bloodlust - who donated his money as a way to atone for his sins. His first victim was his mother, hence his insistence that Dong-chan be good to his. Saet-byul fell victim because she tried to help him before - thinking that he was a beggar - and so trusted him when she next saw him in the car park. The reason why he was sleeping rough and incognito? The better to access potential victims.
Back to a more serious note, I suspect that not all the murders were committed by the same person, and that the other killer(s) will be future red herrings in Soo-hyun's quest for justice. The women were probably killed by the same person, since the modus operandi seemed the same. They were killed on three consecutive days; they were all killed in the entertainment district; they were all in their twenties and thirties; they were killed soon after the murderer approached them; their corpses were unceremoniously and carelessly dumped close to where they were killed - so the murders seem more spur of the moment rather than carefully planned. The fact that the killer would suddenly want to kidnap a small child, and let her live for a week afterwards, seems way too out of character. The only similarities are that CCTV was avoided, and that these victims are all female. However I re-watched the relevant parts: the three other victims were attractive women who dressed sexily rather than girlishly, so there's...
Required fields are marked *
Baek Song-yi
March 6, 2014 at 2:29 PM
(Cont.)
However I re-watched the relevant parts: the three other victims were attractive women who dressed sexily rather than girlishly, so there's really no way to conflate them with Saet-byul due to their gender. As for CCTV, the three women were killed in alleys, so surveillance was probably patchy or non-existent. It is a much more difficult feat to kidnap a child in the middle of a car park in front of a well-lit office building. Killing the women may not have needed pre-meditation, but kidnapping Saet-byul certainly did.
The proof that the kidnapper gave, namely that he stabbed one of the victims fifteen times, seems to be further evidence for having at least two different criminals. Would someone who viciously stabbed a woman fifteen times - clearly many more times than needed to kill her - really have the clarity of mind to count his stabs? More likely that the kidnapper was an opportunistic witness, who used this information to form a cover identity.
Furthermore, I also am not convinced by the kidnapper's reason for taking Saet-byul: as a form of protest against the president. From what we know, the kidnapper would not have taken Saet-byul by chance. Why would he then take the child of the president's political opponent? It seems likely that his purported reason is merely an excuse for a much more personal vendetta. Considering how difficult it would have been to kidnap Saet-byul in the first place, and that he had an isolated hostage cabin ready for use, this was a premeditated crime that was carefully planned. NB: This speculation may also have been influenced by how much I loved the Danish-Swedish drama 'The Bridge'.
Goodness knows I rambled on forever. That is just how much I love this drama already. If you got to here, have a gold star and thumbs up from me.
Finally, last but not least - welcome solabelly! It seems that you and dramallama have great luck at picking fantastic dramas.
Required fields are marked *
CaroleMcDonnell
March 6, 2014 at 2:33 PM
oh my gosh, i looooooooooooove your posts. So much to think about.
Required fields are marked *
Baek Song-yi
March 6, 2014 at 2:54 PM
Aw, thank you. I delivered on the thumbs up, here's the gold star: ☆
I'm slightly mortified re-reading my comments - I can't believe I wrote so much for the *second* episode. I guess I got overexcited, haha.
I'm also slightly tipsy: so no impulse control. (In case you were wondering, it was chicken and beer. Obviously.)
Required fields are marked *
ilikemangos
March 6, 2014 at 3:33 PM
I wouldn't have noticed at all if you hadn't said that.. But are you me? I had chicken and beer yesterday to calm my withdrawals. Thankfully there are decent to good offerings in dramaland.
Baek Song-yi
March 6, 2014 at 5:10 PM
You are either secretly my unni, Man Song-yi, or I have been blacking out Dong-chan-style. Evidently my alter ego likes mangoes.
ilikemangos
March 6, 2014 at 2:52 PM
*Clap*
These posts were very insightful...
It could go anywhere from here.
I like how this show brings out alot of perceptive, imaginative thoughts from all of us.
Required fields are marked *
Baek Song-yi
March 6, 2014 at 2:56 PM
I gave you two thumbs up by accident. Oops.
☆
Required fields are marked *
Sunny
March 6, 2014 at 9:21 PM
"The proof that the kidnapper gave, namely that he stabbed one of the victims fifteen times, seems to be further evidence for having at least two different criminals. Would someone who viciously stabbed a woman fifteen times – clearly many more times than needed to kill her – really have the clarity of mind to count his stabs? More likely that the kidnapper was an opportunistic witness, who used this information to form a cover identity."
When I think of this I wonder if it's possible that the stabbing murderer really did count. However, it seems plausible that the murderer wouldn't count since he/she dumps the body whichever way and seemingly aren't meticulous.
"Considering how difficult it would have been to kidnap Saet-byul in the first place, and that he had an isolated hostage cabin ready for use, this was a premeditated crime that was carefully planned. NB.:"
This kidnapping does seem premeditated and therefore, like Buticut and a few others had discussed earlier, I also think that there is more than just 1 suspect.
1. Alleged murderer in prison:
Allegedly murdered a female (either killed her beforehand and then dumped her body in a body of water or dumped her unconscious body in a body of water causing the victim to die from drowning).
2. Gangnam Murderer:
Murders females coming from bars/clubs who are dressed provocatively. Murdered 3 females in 3 consecutive days (1 a day). Stabs victims violently in only a couple locations on their body. Dumps dead bodies unscrupulously where they can be found easily the next day. Targets women in dark alleys.
3. Kidnapper Who Phoned In at the news station:
States that he/she is the Gangnam murderer (but I/we think otherwise). States that Saet Byul will die as a result of the Presidents beliefs. Kidnaps Saet Byul in a very short time frame (I assume she gets kidnapped between 18:59:59 and 19:00:00 since the camera zoomed in on the clock before the Gangnam Killer Special began). Kidnaps in an open area where there are plenty of cameras. Kidnaps a child and allows her to live for 7 days. Leaves child in a shack with materials such as drawing items (see art/sketches on shack wall). May have harmed child (killing off slowly?; see bloodied shoes and signs of struggle). Eventually child is found dead, the cause of death being drowning.
4. Kidnapper who phoned in at Soo Hyun house
States that he/she wants cash. Sends a delivery boy to Soo Hyun's house with a secret message. Leaves Soo Hyun a phone in a trashcan and is apparently watching her very closely. Orders Soo Hyun around until we see the struggle between Soo Hyun and either said kidnapper or said kidnapper's henchman.
As an aside: I want to know what happened with that little girl who was left at the train station. Was she a kidnapping victim? Was she the henchman's own daughter? Who is she? How does she connect with the main plot.
5. Kidnapper who phoned in at Soo Hyun house
See bullet #4. If this individual sent a henchman to meet Soo Hyun than we still have yet to find out who the mastermind is (who orchestrated the call and sent that individual/henchman to meet Soo Hyun).
Required fields are marked *
buticut
March 6, 2014 at 10:02 PM
Isn’t the timing with the stabbing just TOO perfect? The kidnapper just told them they got the stabbing number wrong and Woo-jin is called literally seconds afterwards to confirm that. Could he have possibly stabbed the victim twice in the same spot, purposely for the investigators to get it wrong so that he can mock them?
I love your rundown of the suspects’ profiles. I can’t wrap my head around how a single murderer/kidnapper could be so all over the place. Kills three girls at bars, throws them into dumpsters, kidnaps two little girls at two different times and they die in identical ways. Nah, I’ve seen too many Discovery Identity programs to know that this is not the way these things are done LOL.
Required fields are marked *
buticut
March 7, 2014 at 12:11 AM
I’ll write a rundown of some of the characters and why they might or might not be involved in Saet-byul’s death. This is so time-consuming LOL. I will feel so burned if this drama will disappoint me.
The Usual Suspects
- Woo-jin
Why he might be involved: Conveniently distracts Soo Hyun and asks her to have a chat with him, while in the meantime, Min Ah takes Saet-byul to her aunt. There is something about his past that we don’t know, since Dong Chan has some unresolved issues with him. Also, he seems to be a skilled police officer and the kidnapper seems to have some set of skills/inside connections as well.
Why he might not be involved: He cares too much about Soo Hyun to do any harm to her daughter. Plus, apparently he didn’t even know she had one. Acts like a professional and sticks to Soo Hyun, saving her from that attacker who took her money.
- Ji-hoon
Why he might be involved: He doesn’t have any emotions on display in regards to his daughter and feels way too confident about the kidnapper, being sure that he is looking for money and that he will call again, after he provokes him. Clashes with the government, just like the kidnapper.
Why he might not be involved: He is the father, for God’s sake! After the kidnapping, he stays by his wife’s side. Besides, at the end of episode 2, apparently he found out who the killer was and swears to kill him.
- The President/The Minister
Why they might be involved: Ji-hoon is giving them a hard time with his advocacy against death penalty, causing them to lose a lot of money (among other things) by keeping the prisoners alive. They want to convince the masses to embrace the death penalty and what better way than to have a child killed and mediate it. Killing an innocent soul is as low as you can go and it’s even better for them if it’s Ji-hoon’s daughter – that would surely make him give up on his human rights fight.
Why they might not be involved: The kidnapper seems to have strong feelings against the administration, going as far as putting the blame for Saet-byul’s imminent death on the president. This could mean that he is disgusted with their plans to set death penalty in motion.
- Min Ah’s partner
Why he could be involved: Judging by the bruises on her arms, he seems to have a history of violence. Also, he is not too fond of children, since (presumably) he is asking her for an abortion. Makes that phone call right at the time of Saet-byul’s kidnapping and he sounds threatening, even mentioning a file he sent to Soo Hyun, prompting Min Ah to worry.
Why he might not be involved: He is a total stranger. You would guess that Saet-byul’s aunt would have heard her screams or struggles, if she would have been taken away by an unknown person.
- Delivery Man #1 (Screencap: http://s12.postimg.org/yqtx1s9pp/vlcsnap_2014_03_07_08h50m12s157.png )
Why he might be involved: He seems to be strangely disguised, with the boxes covering his entire face except the eyes. He also wears a cap. Bumps into Soo Hyun and goes on his way without even apologizing. As he enters the elevator, he gives her a strange look.
Why he might not be involved: See above. He would also be a stranger for Saet-byul, prompting her to have some kind of a reaction, alerting her aunt. He might have bumped into Soo Hyun by accident.
Required fields are marked *
buticut
March 7, 2014 at 12:14 AM
- Puppy Man
Screencap: http://s12.postimg.org/hsuwfy0bv/vlcsnap_2014_03_07_08h49m15s117.png
Why he might be involved: He is an acquaintance of Saet-byul and knows where she is studying. Since she wouldn’t see him for the first time, she might not scream when she is taken away.
Why he might not be involved: Apart from his surprise at the request, he doesn’t look aggressive (he even smiles as the girls leave). We never see him again and hey – if a man treats a puppy well, he can’t be that bad. Also, don’t dogs usually spot baddies? This one was pretty calm.
- Delivery Man #2
Screencap: http://s12.postimg.org/rovzfl63x/vlcsnap_2014_03_07_08h51m29s162.png
- Money Man
Screencap:
http://s30.postimg.org/4vii6gk4x/vlcsnap_2014_03_07_09h24m13s74.png
Why they might be involved: Even though they tried to scam her and run away with her money, this doesn’t necessarily exclude that they do have ties with the real kidnapper.
Why they might not be involved: Oh, come on, a bunch of amateurs. Showing their faces around to the cops and putting themselves into a compromising position. The kidnapper seems cleverer than that.
- Snake lead singer
Why he might be involved: He probably got in touch with Saet-byul on a few occasions while concerting – after all, she probably is his youngest fan, so she stands out. He seems to have a tragic past, involving a suicide of his brother, if I understood it right. It could be that he blames the government/authorities for what happened to his brother and seeks revenge. Also, Saet-byul wouldn’t have feared leaving the parking lot with him.
Why he might not be involved: As a lead singer of a band, he is recognizable and he can’t just wander around as he pleases. Besides, life’s pretty sweet when you’re famous – why bother with an 8 year old? We know nothing about him.
buticut
March 7, 2014 at 12:18 AM
- Young-gyu
Why he might be involved: He is probably Saet-byul’s only friend and they previously went together to places without letting anyone know. They’ve known each other for a year. Because of his disability, he is capable of doing things without realizing the outcome. The purpose might not have been a kidnap, but just to take her away to spend more time together. Also, the Young-gyu theory works only if we assume that the live phone call from the kidnapper is a different thing altogether and that it’s not Saet-byul screaming “Mommy!”.
Why he might not be involved: it’s more likely for him to have witnessed what happened with Saet-byul and even that could be a stretch. The setting is way too elaborate – he couldn’t have possibly had the wit to take her that far and lock her up. How would they have gotten there in first place? Everything seemed way too well prepared to be done by someone like him.
- Dong Chan
Why he might be involved: At this point, he is the most obvious choice. He is familiar with the girl, he dreams with the murder he witnessed, featuring a guy who looks nothing like the brother, has worrisome blackouts when drinking – he can’t remember what he did and we as the audience don’t see what he did. We see he finds a hairpin in his pocket shaped like a strawberry, just like the one Saet-byul had on the night she was taken. There were camera zooms on his bloody shirt – we can assume it was because of the fight he had the night before, but we also know that there was blood on Saet-byul’s belongings, showing signs of a struggle. He doesn’t believe in justice and he’s probably against the government as well.
Why he might not be involved: Even though we know that strange things happen when he drinks, he doesn’t necessarily turn into a vicious animal. After all, on one occasion, he got drunk and only slept with a woman, without causing any harm. Despite his loser life and lack of communication with his family, he seems to be good-hearted, genuinely liking Saet-byul, who helps him (sort of) get out of prison. He lacks motive – unless there is a multiple personality disorder involved, I doubt he would have caused any harm to the girl while sober. Also, she was held 7 days – did he get drunk 7 days in a row? Did a different personality of his kick in at some point, making him leave the girl there, then returning to check on her? He didn’t stay with her 24/7, that’s for sure, since he was even arrested while she was being kidnapped.
Sunny
March 7, 2014 at 2:11 AM
I love this analysis so much! Thank you for taking the time to create this. I feel so engrossed in this drama already and it has only been 2 episodes.
Your side-by-side comparison is very helpful. When I look at it I feel like I have to go back to drawing board.
Would the writer make the villain so apparent to us? Or would the writer really make the villain so apparent that we begin to dismiss them as having been too apparent when they really are the villain.
What I've noticed in the analysis is that those in question are only men. What about the women in this drama? For instance:
1. The lady that threw the tomato/item at Saet Byul's dad
Could: She wants Saet Byul's dad to feel her pain!
Couldn't: She is also a mother and although disgusted and angry, she may not want another mother to suffer through what she has suffered although it might be a different story for her husband though......
2. The nanny (might be complicit)
Could: She seems to gambling (remember how she left Saet Byul alone and was muttering about how she didn't want them to pass out the cards before she got there). Maybe she entered into some financial woes and wanted to kidnap Saet Byul for ransom money, however, this makes no sense since the kidnapper on air stated that Saet Byul would die as a result of the president. My theory for the nanny could only work if there were two kidnappings instead of one.
Couldn't: She was there at the scene caught on camera and even called the mother repeatedly to let her know that she didn't see Saet Byul.
3. Min-ah (auntie) (might be complicit)
Could: Someone mentioned earlier that maybe, just maybe, Saet Byul's dad is having an affair with Min-Ah. If this is true, then, maybe out of her disgust for him abusing her and requesting that she abort her child she kidnaps his child instead. This theory only works if there were two kidnappings (see bullet#2 for explanation).
Couldn't: She was also caught on camera and we see her leaving the scene to head back towards the building. What would she gain from kidnapping a child?
4. Young Gyu's granny
Could: Maybe she's been the killer all along 10 years ago and even now. Maybe she chose Saet Byul because she was easy access (always with Young Gyu) and maybe this is how Young Gyu was able to capture what happened to Saet Byul with his camera (going off of synopsis given on viki.com). This may also explain why there was a struggle at the shack (grandmother is weak as a result of age....)
Couldn't: Why would she kill the only friend her grandson really had? In addition, she is old and is focused on her son who is in prison.
5. Saet Byul's teacher (Yes! Far stretch, way, way, way left-field)
Could: No idea since this is way left field
Couldn't: No idea since this is way left field
6. Destiny Owner lady (Again, another left-fielder)
Could: She lost her own daughter (assumption) so why not take away someone else's. Some people feel better in their misery when they have others to join them. She may have warned them just for the heck of it, for the thrill of seeing Soo Hyun frightened. Again, this only works if there were two kidnappers.
Couldn't: Why would she warn them of danger in the first place?
I don't want to solely assume that the murderer is a male. Excuse my shoddy explanations. I'm pooped.
:-)
buticut
March 7, 2014 at 10:46 PM
Awww, thanks Sunny! We seem to be on the same page on numerous occasions. Thank you for reading my awfully-long posts.
That is indeed a big question – after all, the best way to hide yourself is in plain sight. We might dismiss theories and suspects because they would be too obvious, but what if? How many red herrings are there really?
As I was writing it, I noticed the lack of women as well, but I had the sneaky suspicion you would come with your own theories, since you are more alert than me when it comes to them. However, a woman kidnapper/killer would be an interesting change – we don’t see this scenario very often, since when we think of a ruthless, violent crime, we pretty much have the image of a man first.
2. If the nanny is a complicit in some way, let’s not forget that apparently, she doesn’t see Saet-byul at any time. What’s strange here is that Soo Hyun told her that Saet-byul will be there in a minute, yet, as seen on the CCTV, she doesn’t even look once at the entrance. The normal thing to do when you’re waiting for someone is too look at the direction from where that person will come. Ok, maybe she got distracted or had things on her mind, but that is something you can add on the Could list as well. Also, the calling is convenient so that nobody suspects her, since she tried to alert Soo Hyun in time (when Soo Hyun finally answered, she was already there for 20 minutes waiting). BUT, since she called early on, it also gave less time for the kidnapper to make an escape, something not wanted if she was in any way involved.
3. If Min-ah is involved, I am guessing she was forced (blackmailed) to be an accomplice. Again, it’s quite possible that the husband has an affair with her and asking her for an abortion, because it would ruin his public and private image. Not to mention that she looked uncomfortable when Soo Hyun asks about the beating and abortion. Also, when she speaks on the phone, the possible blackmailer says he sent the files to writer Kim (Soo Hyun). What files? Could that be a folder containing photo evidence of her husband’s affair with Min-ah?
I am not really feeling the rest, but hey, I don’t discard them either. ANYTHING is possible :).
Sunny
March 8, 2014 at 7:58 PM
:-)
windsun33
March 6, 2014 at 11:00 PM
Your thinking is a lot like mine - I am simply not buying a lot of the wild theories, and I also think there are still a lot of missing clues that have not come out yet.
The callers knowledge of how many stab wounds could also have come from someone associated with the police or forensics in some way.
The hair pin - while it seems like a significant clue, I think it is a red herring. Two possibilities are that (a) it is an identical hair pin but not the same one (which leads to many other questions, so not giving that one a big chance) or (b) the location of where he got drunk and or beat up was the location of the girls kidnapping, and it stuck to his clothes by accident. To make him the killer at this point is just too obvious.
And why did she drown? Even if she was trying to escape, why would she run into the lake? I suspect she was drowned, not by any accident or action on her part.
Required fields are marked *
Sunny
March 6, 2014 at 11:51 PM
She could of drowned because,
1. If the kidnapper gave her very little to no food or water she would have been immensely thirsty. Therefore, after getting free, Saet Byul could have simply acted on survival instincts and went straight for the water so that she could drink.
Going along with this theory, most likely she fell into the water because she was too weak and as a result she drowned.
Required fields are marked *
buticut
March 6, 2014 at 4:31 PM
Baek Song-yi, love love love your comments! Oh God, same thing happened to me with the dehydration!
As for your points
1) I feel too there is more to the scenario than: she tried to break free and possibly drowned accidentally. Clearly, with all the blood on the shoes and her objects, some violence was involved and I found it curious that it seems that she struggled. Since she is so tiny, I guess the kidnapper wasn’t that bulky himself, if she managed to cause him some harm.
2) Those are some great theories about grandpa, the dog keeper and the Minister of Justice, who out of these three, is the shadiest character. It’s not that I want him to be a total wildcard, but please leave Woo-jin alone lol. I remember a crappy movie called The Bone Collector, where the criminal only appears ONCE. There is no backbone to him, we know nothing about him, thus we aren’t really invested. It want him to be someone who we know (ok, we think we know), with all the clues being there.
3) Yes yes yes with the multiple killers…there is just too much discrepancy between the patterns. Besides, a kidnapper tells you his requests from the start: “If you don’t give me ___ won, this girl will die”. But here, he plain and simple says she WILL DIE, without any IFs involved.
4) The stabbing detail makes me think there is someone from the inside either being part of the criminal network or being the mastermind himself. How did he know they will miscount the stabbings, unless we are talking about someone who was there all the time during the investigation? How did he know not just the exact count, but also the fact that they miscounted? I am not sure the press was aware of such details, before the release of the final report.
5) Hahaha you are not the only one who got carried away, but I enjoyed so much reading you!
Required fields are marked *
Baek Song-yi
March 6, 2014 at 5:21 PM
I honestly needed a bottle of water beside my laptop. And my eyes were embarrassingly swollen the next day.
1) Ooh, I didn't even notice the blood. Nice catch.
2) Someone's bias is showing, haha. But yeah, it would be a total copout if the kidnapper were a random madman. We'll probably be turned against the main leads one by one, but I just can't bear to contemplate it just yet.
3) Great minds think alike.
4) I also considered that. But since they are on a crime show asking viewers to phone in with tips, it's probably not too big a leap that some details of the crimes have been released. My 'correct count' explanation was that the kidnapper witnessed the stabbing, but I do prefer the idea that the criminal has infiltrated the system. (But then the finger points at Woo-jin...)
5) Aw, thanks. Have a ☆.
Required fields are marked *
DayDreamer
March 6, 2014 at 4:33 PM
Ha! Love the name you chose for yourself...Baek Song-yi...
You just gave me a surprising piece of news. The writer is the same writer of Iljimae??? The Lee Jun Ki version?? OMG. That drama had bad writing even if I secretly loved it. But this is definitely a significant improvement. Glad to see the change.
Aside from that, I agree that there are and will be many red herrings. Like you said, there was one guy who killed the three women for whatever his sadistic tendencies and this other guy kidnapped Saet Byul for reasons related to the president, the idea of capital punishment, and Saet Byul's parents. Then the guy who wanted money is just some idiot taking advantage of someone misery and plight to make money out of it.
Anyways, don't worry about long posts. This show is exciting so it's only reasonable to talk about it at length. :) By the way, I also loved your comments on Three Days. They got a chuckle out of me. I'm not sure I will continue with the show...let's see if episode 2 gets better.
Required fields are marked *
Baek Song-yi
March 6, 2014 at 5:34 PM
I know right! That invisibility cloak was really something. I too loved it despite its flaws, but I don't think I could go back and watch it again.
Thanks for the compliment - but I can be such a rambler. I fear I'll be writing essays in the comments before long, this drama is just too good. And I'm just about to watch episode two of 'Three Days': I really want it to be amazing, but I have no patience for boring dramas. Oh well, I'm just grateful that I found another crack drama to replace 'You From Another Star'.
Daydreamer! Fourth ☆ for you! You go Daydreamer!
Required fields are marked *
28 zessyjuanita2
March 6, 2014 at 3:52 PM
Wow daebak!!!
Required fields are marked *
29 Sajen
March 6, 2014 at 4:39 PM
(Did his brother really murder someone? Or did he just happen to find the body and move it?)
Personally I think Dong-chan killed whoever it was in one of his drunken blackouts and Dong-ho in his simpleminded mentally challenged brother way took the blame to protect Dong-chan.
I thought it was a much better, if hard to watch at points, episode than the first. I felt and still feel that most of what happened in the first episode could and should have been saved till after the kidnapping, still I think the first and second episodes work much better as a set.
I'd say comparing Lee Bo-young's performance here in the second episode and Jeon Do-yeon's performance in Secret Sunshine they're almost equal.
Required fields are marked *
windsun33
March 6, 2014 at 11:08 PM
I don't think either one of the brothers killed the woman. I would dispute the drunken brothers ID of who was carrying the body also (that whole conviction seems a bit shaky actually). For Dong Chan to be the killer is just too cut and dried, and I think all the "clues" that point to him are fake.
Maybe it is only obvious to me, but there is a very good reason why both of them ended up in the lake to die at exactly the same time - and that is that they will both get the same offer of 14 days and will end up working together.
Required fields are marked *
buticut
March 7, 2014 at 12:53 AM
It's not helping that Dong-ho did confess to committing that murder, despite his mother's efforts to make him deny it (if I understood it correctly). Soo Hyun's co-worker discusses this in the car with her. I don't buy that Dong-ho killed that woman either, I believe he rather admitted the crime to protect someone. Could that someone be his brother? Someone else?
Haven't thought about both of them going back in time, that's an interesting perspective. From the synopsis it does seem that the two will work together on finding out who did it and possibly stopping it from happening. It would be awfully heartbreaking if Dong Chan would give his all in the investigation, only to find out that he in fact did it, because of a multiple personality disorder of sorts. Or maybe it will just prove to be his chance at redemption, giving up on living like a loser and making a name of himself, since I believe he left the police because Woo-jin spread out rumors about his family history, which embarrassed him.
Even though I get what you mean that at this point, it's too obvious to make Dong Chan the killer, I feel there is one too many red herrings with him: the recurrent dream, the bloody shirt, the hairpin, the blackouts. Or maybe they are indeed just teasing us with all this.
You are more clearheaded than I am. I get carried away by fantasy theories LOL, while you stick more to logic.
Required fields are marked *
30 whimsyful
March 6, 2014 at 4:42 PM
Welcome solabelly!
Totally invested in this show after ep 2, and I really hope the writer is up to the task. Writing a good mystery show or a time travel show is hard enough separately, but together? What we've seen so far is excellent, so I just hope the plot doesn't become a convoluted mess later. And I really, *really* hope the writer has everything planned out and won't be making stuff up by the seat of their pants once the live-shoot hits.
Now for theories:
1) Saet-byul's kidnapping seems to be premeditated, but it also depended a good deal on chance. The CCTV tapes seem to clearly show her vanishing during a very small time frame. If Soo-hyun hadn't been asked to tea by Woo-jin, or if her co-worker didn't get that upsetting call *exactly then* and got distracted, Saet-byul would have been escorted all the way to her nanny. So I'm wondering if those distractions were planned as well (which would implicate either Woo-jin or whoever distracted the coworker), or if the kidnapper was stalking them and was simply waiting for the opportune moment.
2) I agree with the above posters that the killings of those women in Gangnam and Saet-byul's kidnapping is done by two different parties, since the MO's are completely different. Does this mean that Saet-byul's kidnapper either witnessed a killing, or has access to the case information?
3) I'm guessing Dong-chan's black-outs are another red-herring, or rather hoping, because I really like his character. He could have gotten that hairpin from Saet-byul in her house. However, his character is by far the most disconnected from the main plotline, so I'm wondering how it'll all tie in, considering he's the main male lead.
Required fields are marked *
sandy80
March 6, 2014 at 5:01 PM
actually both her story and his are connected and he will be the one helping her so he is being the bad guy is not likely
Required fields are marked *
Sunny
March 6, 2014 at 8:00 PM
3. I don't think he got the hairpin from Saet Byul's house unless Saet Byul has several of those hairpins lying around.
Facts that I am aware of:
1. Saet Byul was wearing that hairpin the day/night she went missing.
2. Dong Chan had Saet Byul's hairpin or an identical hairpin that may not have belonged to Saet Byul but looks exactly like her's the day or a couple days after she went missing.
----------------------------------------------
ilikemangos commented earlier stating that, "Dong-Chan definitely crossed paths with either the kidnapper, saet byul, or circumstances surrounding the kidnap." Which sounds very plausible.
Required fields are marked *
31 Annie
March 6, 2014 at 7:45 PM
I started watching the first episode and stopped because I didn't want to watch unless this series was recapped. I was sure I would miss things. So thank you so much for recapping the pair of you. I'll go watch and be back to read and comment! Thanks again.
Required fields are marked *
32 xvanex
March 6, 2014 at 8:25 PM
girl!!(?) Dong-Chan is rolling around in bed & walking in his boxers & we dont get a screen shot? haha keep working on perfecting the recapping
Required fields are marked *
33 Tulipsaki
March 6, 2014 at 8:46 PM
Solabelly, welcome, and thank you! I did not understand a lot of what happened and you cleared it up very nicely for me,
Required fields are marked *
34 zessyjuanita2
March 6, 2014 at 9:12 PM
daebak!!
Required fields are marked *
35 TheGift
March 6, 2014 at 10:02 PM
lol i felt like i was watching running man during the han river to train station scene minus the violence xD great drama so far!
Required fields are marked *
36 Lindy
March 6, 2014 at 10:24 PM
Wow! I am so impressed with God's Gift - 14 Days so far. The writing is superb and I hope the writers already have their ending because it is so tightly plotted as a real mystery.
So many clues and more than likely a few of them are red herrings. I think, though, the real key is the murder 16 years ago. Someone, not the mentally disabled man on death row, killed a woman, or women, and this has been covered up. A fall guy is blamed. Is the woman in the mysterious coffee shop her mother? Is the mysterious billionaire her father? Has the death of their daughter torn the marriage apart, much as the death of Saet-byul is now doing in Soo-hyun and Ji-hoon's marriage? Do they suspect that the real killer has never been caught?
Maybe with renewed attention on serial murders of women, it's no longer good enough that Dong-ho remains alive in prison and he must be legally killed. Getting someone convicted of murder out of prison is not an easy task, even with compelling evidence of innocence. But it is pretty much impossible to introduce new evidence in a death penalty case if the killer has already been executed for the crime in countries with the death penalty. I would imagine this would be the case in Korea as well.
And the witness, Dong-chan, has to be eliminated as well. The men who are dumping him into the lake are not the same gangster's minions who are chasing him from his house. Completely different crew. Loose ends are being tied up. Maybe it is because the original murderer is back at it after a long hiatus and is killing again. There are three possibilities here: 1) the killer has gone dormant for a few years; 2) he has been in prison on an unrelated charge, or; 3) he has been sent out of the country and has been killing somewhere else. The new prime minister's son has been away but I don't think it is him.
There are going to be at least 8 people returned to life when Soo-hyun makes her deal. Soo-hyun herself, Saet-byul, Dong-chan, Dong-ho, the billionaire and the 3 murdered women. The person fingered as the kidnapper/killer of Saet-byul might have been killed by Ji-hoon as well. I think this person could be Young-gyu. Ji-hoon also might be dead by suicide, having gone so fundamentally against his principles as to take a life in revenge.
Just a wonderful start to this series and I hope they can maintain the quality.
Required fields are marked *
windsun33
March 6, 2014 at 11:23 PM
"...real key is the murder 16 years ago.."
That is my take on it also. That whole conviction seems a bit iffy. I am pretty sure that the woman in the coffee shop is the mother of the girl that was killed at that time. She may be the murderer, but I don't give that much credence. Perhaps the girls fiancé, brother, or even son though?
I see a lot of red herring clues that I think are more for viewer misdirection than actual obvious clues.
Required fields are marked *
Lindy
March 7, 2014 at 9:36 AM
There is so much information at this point that it is hard to sift through it all. Red herrings galore but, to me, the real crime that must be solved is the murder that occurred 16 years ago.
When Soo-hyun speaks directly to her daughter's kidnapper though, she directly addresses the reason for the kidnapping. It's the last minute change in programming to focus on the Gangnam killings. These are serial killings of a specific nature. The killer is what is called a "spree" or "rampage" killer because he has killed 3 women of a specific type and in a specific location on 3 consecutive nights. He targets marginalized women, like bar hostesses, kills them in a frenzied manner (multiple stab wounds) in alleys and then tosses them away like so much garbage.
There is a lot of garbage imagery used, not only with the victims but around Dong-chan as well. He's always being tossed into garbage, hiding in dumpsters and so on. The implication is clear; these people are "garbage" and nobody is supposed to care about them. This includes Dong-ho who has been sitting on death row for 16 years. So when a major nightly news program focuses on the victims in the current murders, certain people are obviously going to get very upset. It hits too close to home and I think these people are the ones who are protecting the the killer from 16 years ago.
The change in focus to serial killers is a last minute change so who ever is orchestrating this thing has to be both intimately connected to the police investigation and also connected to the news program itself. I am very suspicious of Woo-ji, not as the killer as this killer is far too disorganized and wrapped up in his frenzied need to kill to mastermind both a cover-up and a kidnapping, but as someone who was involved in the original killing's cover-up.
Required fields are marked *
buticut
March 8, 2014 at 12:53 AM
I loved your take on the "garbage" theme, but the last part might be too far-fetched. Don't forget that Soo Hyun has the ideas of what crimes to cover, since she is part of the writing team for the show. She decides what to put an emphasis on and she is the one who changed the topics at the last minute.
I feel it's unlikely that Woo-jin has any involvement in the original killing, if you mean the one supposedly committed by Dang-ho, simply because of his age. His character is supposed to be in his early 30s, which means he had around 15, maximum 17 years when that crime happened. Sure, it's possible to have a young killer, but I am not feeling it, especially since the guy carrying the girl from Dong Chan's nightmare seemed to be fairly mature.
Apparently, he is older than Dong Chan, although they worked together in the same division and I think Dong Chan left his job embarrassed because Woo-jin spread info about his family.
Required fields are marked *
Lindy
March 8, 2014 at 10:07 AM
At this point any speculation seems farfetched because a lot of information hasn't yet been revealed. We, as yet, don't know anything about the woman who was murdered 16 years ago. Who her family was, how old she was, what she did for a living, was her murder one of a series of murders of marginalized women, like the Gangnam killings, or not and what were the circumstances surrounding her murder. But you're right, most of the main characters would have been very young at the time of the murder 16 years ago, in their teens or early 20's, so either they are still students or just starting on their careers.
Soo-hyun does make the decision to change the topic at the last minute. But the show has not yet gone to air when her daughter is kidnapped so the kidnapper must have prior knowledge of this change, prior knowledge of the police investigation and know that Saet-byul is with her mother at the studio which is not a usual occurrence. Woo-ji does know all this and this is why I think he might be involved in the original cover up. What I still don't get is why kidnap Saet-byul specifically and link her to the Gangnam killings when any child would serve if the purpose is to change the topic as dramatically as possible.
Like I said, still not enough information, just wild speculation. But what if the victim 16 years ago was a teenaged girl from a prominent family so her murder can't be swept under the carpet but must be "solved" quickly. What if her killer is a teenaged boy from an equally prominent family. And what if there is a credible suspect near to hand in the form of a mentally disabled, easily manipulated young man. This is classic who-done-it murder mystery material.
Lindy
March 8, 2014 at 11:51 AM
Also being involved in the original cover up doesn't necessarily mean at the investigative level. As a teenaged boy, he could have provided the real killer with a faked alibi.
37 liz
March 6, 2014 at 11:08 PM
''You should never call/scream for help, instead scream another thing, like fire for example, this way someone will go to you''
My doctor sister once told me that I should scream that, I found it interesting, she said when people call ''help me'' people tend to ignore/avoid you...
Required fields are marked *
windsun33
March 6, 2014 at 11:33 PM
Hmm.. I would not stake my life on that theory.
Required fields are marked *
liz
March 6, 2014 at 11:49 PM
The person can try and if it doesn't work scream help anyway, I heard that when a person scream help people don't want to get involved, so they avoid you, however if it might affect them directly or they think they are able to help in this kind of situation, you get their attention faster than calling for help... a bit sad to be honest.
Required fields are marked *
windsun33
March 7, 2014 at 3:42 PM
I think that depends a lot more on the individual person than any blanket theory. It has been pretty well proven over the years that the crowd factor is a major reason why people don't "do something".
There have been some interesting studies done on it, and it basically comes down to "if everyone is responsible, then NOBODY is responsible". Everyone expects the "other guy" to do something, but many times everyone is expecting that, so the other guy does not exist.
I have no idea if it true or not, but read someplace that the most effective cry for help is "rape", because that leaves no doubt who is the victim.
Required fields are marked *
38 Ppasun
March 7, 2014 at 5:18 PM
I wonder if President's son, who has stayed overseas for more than 10 years, could have been the killer for whom DC's bro got hanged. They seem to have similar height and body types. And the father who framed someone else to cover for his child is now the president of Korea and hypocritically has declared war against crimes? Hmmm, the plot thickens...
Required fields are marked *
windsun33
March 8, 2014 at 1:58 AM
That crossed my mind also, since he seems very reluctant to stay in Korea for long. Though I don't give that a big chance, I think it is possible.
Required fields are marked *
Lindy
March 8, 2014 at 10:45 AM
The Prime Minister's son is certainly an interesting possibility as a candidate for the murderer from 16 years ago. He's about the right age, he seems to have lived most of his adult life overseas and a series of grisly, spree-type killings of women occur in Gangnam upon his return to the country. But I don't really think the Prime Minister had anything to with the original cover up. He wants his son to return home so he can see his grandchildren grow up. Maybe Mrs. Prime Minister, using her own contacts, is responsible. This drama places mothers and their desire to protect, defend, rescue and see justice done for their children and the lengths they are willing to go to do this at the centre of the action.
Required fields are marked *
39 buticut
March 7, 2014 at 9:50 PM
Something I forgot to mention. The day Young-gyu finds out from that security guard (Who, by the way, is a suspect too, just like everyone else LOL), we can see that one of his slippers has been ripped off.
Screencap: http://s13.postimg.org/lp7jj0j3p/vlcsnap_2014_03_08_07h42m55s100.png
Now this might be something insignificant, since, for example, he had holes in his socks as well, which means he gets a tad careless with his possessions. BUT could he have been involved in something? Did he stumble and fall in an attempt to rescue or harm someone? Maybe a struggle? Or did it just happen accidentally? Hmmmm
Required fields are marked *
buticut
March 8, 2014 at 12:43 AM
Also, this just occurred to me, but the synopsis says Dong Chan is in his late 20s, which means that when the original crime happened 16 years ago, he must have been around 10-13 that time, which means that unless it was a freak accident which started like a child play, there is almost no chance that he could have had anything to do with the murder. Moreover, there is an unknown figure in his dream carrying the body, so the best guess is that there was a third unknown person doing the killing. Also, there is that flashback from the jury court when he admits seeing his brother - that has to be from a re-opening of the case.
Because he was so young at that time, the memories of the murder are even more doubtful. A child can misinterpret what he sees (even adults do that) and he can even get brainwashed into thinking he saw something he didn't
Required fields are marked *
Sunny
March 8, 2014 at 7:44 PM
Good catch
Required fields are marked *
40 Mr Ð
March 8, 2014 at 7:58 AM
hi all, i have yet to begin watching this drama, im playing catch up on "A well raised daughter" and trying to keep up with other recently begun dramas.
I will certainly be putting this on my to watch list, ive skimmed through the above comments as i dont want to hit too many spoilers =)
If anyone wants to join an active asian drama/film fans forum, or veen wants to just come and say hi, please come and visit us at http://k-dramafanzs.proboards.com/
We discuss all things asian from drama and film (past and present) as well as OSTs, we review and help to find sources to watch od find OST/kpop.
Look forward to see some of you guys and girls soon
Mr Ð
Required fields are marked *
41 sirena
March 8, 2014 at 10:38 AM
I'm truly enjoying all of the theories that are being discussed on this forum :) This is usually an indication that the writer is doing his/her job: engaging your mind.
I would like to believe that the 'obvious' suspect isn't responsible for the crime(s) committed sixteen years ago as well as the murder of three women. I'm thinking about Dong-chan. In my opinion, he's too obvious. The writer(s) seems to be dangling him on a hook, trying to convince the audience that he is worthy of suspicion (perhaps he is, who knows?). The blood on his clothes, the child's hairpin that he finds in his pocket and then discards. The night before he was beaten and tossed in a pile of garbage. His clothes may have come into contact with something. Or, the blood (we're assuming it is blood, it could be something else) is old? I mean, Dong-chan seems like the sort of man who frequently gets into scrapes.
I'll try not to get too far ahead of myself. We still have many more episodes left. Hopefully we will not be disappointed. Happy weekend everybody!
Required fields are marked *
rearwindow
March 9, 2014 at 11:59 AM
I agree. I think Dong Chan is the red herring. We're supposed to suspect him (with good reason), but I think that the person responsible is much more powerful than he is.
Required fields are marked *
42 August
March 8, 2014 at 8:07 PM
Episode 2 of God's Gift -14 Days was riveting, suspenseful, heart/gut wrenching, and action packed rollercoaster of a ride.
- Kim Soo-Hyun's fight on the subway platform with the fake kidnapper.
- Her Live-on-the-air plea to the kidnapper to safely return Han Saet-Byeol unharmed.
- Her begging the kidnapper to let her trade her own life on behalf of her daughter's safe return.
- Her declaration to the kidnapper that she would find and chase him/her to the ends of the earth....even to Hell.
- The range of emotion (desperation, grief, anger, etc.) expressed by both parents.
Required fields are marked *
43 rearwindow
March 9, 2014 at 12:10 PM
Oh boy, I'm officially on the God's Gift train.
I no longer think that the husband is a suspect, though I do think that he is wrapped up in some shady work/government dealings that maybe led to the kidnapping inadvertently. I wonder if the photos that were sent to him were blackmailing him? He does seem like a bit of a cipher so I'm not sure what to think of him. I do think that he's involved in some way, just perhaps in a more roundabout way than I considered in episode 1.
The fact that so much attention has been given to the president & the introduction of the death penalty makes me think that perhaps the murder had deeper political motivations than just a deranged serial killer. There are a lot of chess pieces at play here. Did anyone else think the Attorney General was UBER creepy when he started talking about the death penalty at the press conference? I wonder if Dong-ho saw something that he shouldn't have, and is being executed because of it?
So many questions!!
Required fields are marked *
44 jennie
March 12, 2014 at 8:37 PM
....this episode gave me so much pain....still healing as I watch episode 3
Required fields are marked *
45 Hh
June 10, 2017 at 4:50 PM
I really hate the main actresss and she is like a lunatic, both before and after the time lapse. There are certain things that she did (like leaving her daughter alone) that makes her deserves what she got. No sympathy! Also if i could go back time i would do what she did. She is like a crazy betch lol. There is also lots of communication barriers in that dysfunctional family (or culture?)
Required fields are marked *