49

The Sex and the City Effect

I’ve been meaning to write this post for a while but it coincides with recent topics, so here goes.

I think there’s a prevalent (mistaken) perception — particularly if kdramas are a primary source of information — that Koreans are puritanical about sex. In my opinion, they really aren’t. There are traditional elements in the culture, of course (just thinking about discussing sex with family is a horrifying concept) — but it’s like that common misconception that every generation thinks it invented sex. What’s most conservative about Korea, perhaps, is the representation of sex in the media, but I think it would be short-sighted to assume the culture as a whole is some Victorian, pearl-clutching, bless-my-heart, faint-at-any-hint-of-indecency society.

To wit, I present exhibits A, B, and C: the kdramas (because it always comes back to dramas!) Coffee Prince, Hyena, and Romance Hunter. Yes, I know dramas aren’t a complete or accurate representation of society, but I think it’s worth pointing out that there’s a spectrum here, too.

 
First up, COFFEE PRINCE.

Someone sent me this article from Newsen (thanks, SJ) about the positive reaction from audiences to the candid, unflowery treatment of sex in Coffee Prince. The article came out before this week’s episodes 15 and 16, but I think the same applies in light of recent events, too.

“In discussing the factors contributing to this drama’s strong appeal, the frank discussion of sex among the main characters cannot be left out. This drama depicts how the love between a man and woman doesn’t merely end with a mental or emotional understanding of love, as in fairy-tale books.”

(Original Newsen article.)

The article cites the scene between Ha Rim and Eun Chan, where he asks her what she and Han Gyul did last night and chides her for not understanding a man’s sexual desires, as an example of this kind of frank talk. It also calls Han Sung and Yu Ju’s relationship “refreshing.”

“This couple is yet unmarried. However, Yu Ju and Han Sung have naturally progressed to a sexual relationship. This situation doesn’t feel very strange; they’re cool about their love, both mentally and physically. This couple of ten years loves each other in both mind and body.”

The article expresses a bit of surprise at the level of candor, because Coffee Prince’s handling of sex and love is rather new in the world of kdramas (at least the kind on broadcast TV). In that respect, the candor is not entirely familiar — but it’s entirely appreciated.

Next up: ROMANCE HUNTER.

This TVN cable drama aired earlier this year, and (rightly) found itself compared to Sex and the City. The mere setup — thirtyish working women talking openly about sex and going through the ups and downs of dating — is enough to merit the (ubiquitous!) SATC comparison, but Romance Hunter does pilfer a lot in its characterizations, too.

The five main characters and good friends (two of whom went on to portray rivals in Bad Couple) can all be assigned a SATC personality, or perhaps a combination of them. The main character is the most Carrie-like, narrating about the trials and tribulations of finding love. She’s no prude, but she’s still a bit naïve when it comes to finding her ideal guy. (She’s also a love advisor on a radio show called “Romance Hunter,” where all but one of the other women also work.) The girlfriends frequently go out for dinner and drinks to discuss their love lives.

There’s the writer-producer of the show, married with a kid, who’s the family breadwinner, often snappish at her slackerly husband — she resembles late-series Miranda. The younger one is naïve, feminine, and Charlotte-esque. Another is classic Samantha — experienced, cool, and unabashedly materialistic (wants a husband with the best possible qualifications, even if she likes someone else more). The last is the least SATC-like, the woman we all hate to see being treated badly by her boyfriend — we wish she’d chuck his sorry ass out on the pavement (heck, she wishes she could too) — but she’s too dependent, lonely, and/or in love.

Being a cable show (official TVN site), Romance Hunter is able to venture into more explicit scenes and discussion, bearing an age restriction of 19-and-up. Despite the overwhelming similarities of the show to SATC, I found myself able to enjoy the matter-of-fact way the characters discuss sex, without the coyness or preciousness that sometimes accompanies the topic on more mainstream broadcast dramas.

For instance, the woman with the asshole boyfriend does her best to treat him nicely, and receives nothing but dismissiveness in return. After she’s spent a long day working, then cooking and cleaning for him, he finds solo gratification in demanding a blowjob (asserting his demand with the never-cool downward head-push), then relaxing back with no intention of returning the favor. On top of that, he takes offense to how his girlfriend won’t “swallow” — insinuating that spitting means she doesn’t love him.

 

 
Then, our main heroine goes to a motel with a new boyfriend, eagerly anticipating her first time having sex with with him, only to be sorely disappointed at his early finish. Or shall we say premature finish. He’s not the most handsome catch, but she’s found herself falling for his earnestness and kindness — but the day after the failed attempt, she moans to her friend, “What if he’s always like that? I hate rabbits!” (Rabbits might best be translated with the English counterpart “minutemen.”)

 
There’s more to the story than just sex, of course — at the core is the familiar theme of women looking for love and (hopefully) finding it. Romance Hunter is light amusement — and at first I was on the fence about continuing. But I’m female, and I’m weak, because the hint of what will probably be the final romantic pairing for our leads is this guy right here >>>. Currently, he’s a PD also working at the radio station, whom the heroine talks to easily and comfortably. I’m guessing his role will gradually become bigger as he watches the main character stumble through one failed romance after another.

 

(Also bearing the Sex and the City comparison is the short mini-drama (also cable, also 19+) Five Girls, but IMO, that show isn’t worth your time. You can check out the official site here if you care to.)

 

Last up: HYENA

This TVN cable drama (19+) was billed as the male Sex and the City, and I certainly see where that comes from. (Official site here.)

What I like about Hyena is that despite the SATC comparison, its characterization of the four male friends feels more natural, and less forced into a mold, than in Romance Hunter. While Romance Hunter feels like an attempt to be modern, Hyena has a ring of “this is what guys really are like.”

It’s very boys-will-be-boys, as we watch our main character (played by Kim Min Jong) stumble through and muck up a good relationship. He’s due to be married any day now (to his longtime girlfriend, played by Park Shi Yeon) but can’t help himself from looking at every hot girl who walks by. We wince along, knowing he’s ruining things for himself.

In fact, the thing I don’t quite like about Hyena is probably also the thing that makes it more watchable — and that is in seeing Kim Min Jong’s character suffer for his stupidity. He’s a bit too reckless and inconsiderate for me to care about his well-being (after the first episode), but since he doesn’t get away with his foolishness, I’m able to watch without wanting to throw something at him.

One friend is even worse than he is — the only thing holding him back from being insufferably unscrupulous is the fact that he’s perhaps less good-looking than his friends, and doesn’t have quite as many opportunities. Still, he’ll do (and say) anything to get a girl into bed, and has no pride to speak of where sex is concerned.

A third friend (Oh Man Seok) is the complete opposite — highly principled and extremely picky. On every blind date, he asks the woman a logic problem, and doesn’t bother cultivating any interest if she fails to answer. Then, when he finally meets a woman who answers correctly, he takes an interest in her — but then sees her poorly groomed feet and is immediately turned off. (You know, Oh Man Seok isn’t the most handsome actor around, and his character isn’t even a type to make the ladies swoon — yet — but there’s something really compelling about him.)

The fourth friend is a cool, detached playboy who doesn’t seem to have any emotional attachment to anyone, and regards the women who throw themselves at him with mild amusement.

 

Dude, when I started this post, I totally had a point, and now it’s kind of fizzled into the air. So I’ll just say this: I’m not saying Korean culture is wild and sex-crazed, but as with anything, there’s a range. I just thought it was worth pointing out something on this end of the drama spectrum.

Tags: , , , ,

49

Required fields are marked *

great powers of observation.
thanks for continuing to stimulate dialogue.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I'm glad that sex is being more open in these dramas! though I personally could care less for Sex in the City type shows (SITC made me gag, not for the sex or the plot, but for the women in the show). What I do like is how Coffee Prince is changing things up a bit.

What drew me to Coffee Prince is it shows that love has no gender, which is what I also like about the Japanese and Taiwanese dramas, Hana Kimi- You simply fall in love with the person you are most attracted to on a physical and emotional level. HG fell in love with EC even he thought she was a boy, it truly shows that love has no bounds.

I also love how it touched on women being more independent (such as EC being the head of her family, or wanting to wait to get married until she has settled with her life and is making a general income so she doesn't have to live off of HG). What got me the most though was, though EC is more conservative and thinks you don't have sex until after marriage, even she is human and understands that you can be with the person you love married or not.

Great post!

-Jamie

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

kdramas do generally tend to hold back a lot about sex but the movies are far more open about it. The same actors who appear passionate in movies hold back in dramas. I don't know why that is, but that's just the way it appears.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Actually, I know why that is... I'm sure there's censorship in Korean T.V. just like there is in American T.V.

But as an American (well, kinda) viewer, it is quite frustrating to watch a supposedly passionate couple kiss like they are 5 year olds... or cold fish.

It is nice to see Han Gul and Yu Ju because for starters, they are both in their thirties and for years, had no plans to get married so it would make no sense to not have sex. What would they be waiting for?

Other dramas have pre-marital sex (Queen of the Game but they end up with a baby), Dal Ja's Spring and Kim Sam Soon (although they made it comedic), Lovers etc etc so pre-marital sex in dramas still not unchartered waters.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Sarah, this is a very interesting post. I'd never heard of/watched the shows you described, but in my time with K-drama I've noticed mainstream shows becoming bolder regarding the physical side of love. Coming from a culture that is "hypocritically" (I guess that might/might not be too strong a word) conservative in its silver screen too, I can completely understand what you mean that its not all representative of the actual population. Just because it takes 6-7 episodes for our leads to peck each other's cheeks leads to the presumption that in Korea (or India) you'd never see a couple kiss! Which is, ofcourse, a complete misconception, and there are instances when people get a true cultural shock because they don't find the naive nation they expected. On the other hand, with the American screen already open about sexuality with shows like SATC, or Will & Grace, Girlfriends, etc., there's a LARGE idea that most Americans are sex-crazed and continually making out in the streets. HA. Its actually what a lot of new students from conservative countries expect to find here. I think thats a very fascinating aspect of culture and media...how it gets broadcasted in a movie or a show can completely change the perception of the world.
Back to Korea, I think with shows like CP, k-drama PDs are testing the waters and realizing that the culture's ready for a more candid view of sex and love too. I'm not sure if it created any kind of controversy in Korea (did it?). When I started watching, the climax and end of the show was often a kiss. Now, as shows get more realistic, and relationships are better developed like in MNIKSS, "skinship ;)" is more present and nicely done.
With Bollywood in the past few years (if you're interested!), there's been a kind of frantic craze to catch up to the Western world, in trying to talk about sex and fitting it in awkwardly and often vulgarly. Sex and conversations about sex are still depicted very crudely or unnaturally in a large part of Indian cinema (and not at all in the starkly conservative Indian dramas), which really disappoints me. Passion and emotion can be portrayed more gracefully, like done in CP perhaps. And it can be discussed with more wit and realism, like SATC, or, based on what you described, Romance Hunters. Regardless of those opinions, there's atleast a similar effort to shake off the false cloak of "we don't touch fingers until marriage" kind of idea that the world has. I think thats healthy and important, to realize that people everywhere, in cultures like ours, are all aware of the physical aspect of love and maintain a healthy, natural sexuality.
Thanks for that insight, Sarah!

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Yes, a sense of censorship (and the age guidelines) keep graphic content toned down on broadcast television -- but I suppose I'm talking more about the treatment of the issue, not necessarily the explicit content showing it. (Which is also why films are much freer in how they handle sexual and adult material.) Dramas like Dal Ja and Samsoon did involve sex, and for the most part I think it was handled well, though I still think they handled it with a bit of preciousness. Not that I want it to be treated crudely, but there's also something refreshing -- to borrow the reporter's words -- about being matter-of-fact and candid.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

funny thing is, this morning I was also wondering how sex was perceived in the korean culture ... because dramas never seem to explore that side of relationships...its all about the emotional part, but i just gotta wonder if those people (characters) aren't sexualy frustrasted with all the talking...I mean in "Exhibitions of fireworks" the character played by Han chae Young was with her boyfriend for almost a decade and they had never, ever ...ever... e.v.e.r...had sex...I mean I don't know a man that would go 2 months without ...but then again people do say "you can't miss something you've never had," but i doubt that goes for anybody over the age of 17-especially for boys-... Its good to see that there are dramas such as Coffee Prince, that are not afraid of talking about sex, though it they don't take it lightly...But i do admire that side of Korean culture... Not the fact that the media is trying to portray an asexual kind of a society, but the fact that sex is not something they take lightly... thanks for sharing this J-Beans

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I thought Koreans were probably puritanical about sex until I saw Kim Sung Soo's debut movie about love and sex (I forget the name). :O I nearly had a heart attack with its extraordinarily frank portrayal of sex...

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

In the time it took for me to post my comment, it became moot lol

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Rather than Korean society being puritanical, I just assumed that it was due to a deeply developed sense of social courtesy/sensibility to not talk about sex;especially in polite company. And, that sense governs the extent of discussing any sexual issues in the dramas because the drama has to be polite and courteous to the viewer. Discussing sex would be tantamount to talking about your athlete's foot at the dinner table. I'm not so familiar with Korean society, but I'm pretty sure that it's true for Chinese society.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I have often wondered if kdramas are reflective of society or if they are didactic...attempting to "teach" viewers how to behave (I hope that doesn't sound too strong)...they seem to be family-centric at least in terms of marital conditions/parental approval for marriage...they also seem to emphasize self-sacrifice (most often, it seems, for the sake of family)

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Perhaps they are trying to get the largest audience possible? Because my mom and her friends (all in the mid-50s) won't watch shows that are heavy on the sex and intimate relationships. It's one of the main reasons none of them watch American TV and movies and stick to Asian ones.

And while the younger audience might not be offended, they aren't turned off when sex isn't portrayed.

So by being more conservative, the show can attract a larger "family" audience.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Romance Hunter and Hyena both sound interesting. I can't find a Wiki page for Romance Hunter, so maybe it's not subbed by fans? I hope it's also available on Clubbox

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

"Rather than Korean society being puritanical, I just assumed that it was due to a deeply developed sense of social courtesy/sensibility to not talk about sex;especially in polite company. And, that sense governs the extent of discussing any sexual issues in the dramas because the drama has to be polite and courteous to the viewer. Discussing sex would be tantamount to talking about your athlete’s foot at the dinner table. I’m not so familiar with Korean society, but I’m pretty sure that it’s true for Chinese society."

Auntie Mame makes a good point. I think in a way its trying to be more polite and not talk about it too much about in public. Im thinking these dramas are made by those, maybe coz they want help people open up and introduce a more open view and test waters. Its a topic for them to be kept more private? I also like the fact that in Kculture, sez isnt taken that lightly and for it to be shown in a different aspect makes it different from other cultures. But i think audiences are becoming more mature about it, i can also name 'What's Up Fox' as one of those risque dramas, after the steamy scene from Lovers as well. But I agree with Sarah, that like dramas like Samsoon and Dalja it was handled well. That's better to see I think.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

to lolo, gramps is that you?

"Dude, when I started this post, I totally had a point." That made me laugh out loud. Coming from Javabeans, from whom quality and, of course, a point are expected, that was funny.

Oh, I have a question I have always meant on researching. When I watch dramas, I see a little yellow (I think it's yellow, but I'm not sure. I'm color-memory-challenged.) circle with a number in it on the upper right hand corner of my screen. Usually it's a 15 or a 13. I've always wondered what it stood for. But I see the number 19 on your screencaps for "Romance Hunter." Does that number stand for the age-restriction?

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I never really saw it that way, but i did wonder why in some dramas the "LOVE "scenes were a bit dull, or conservative!!! but after cp, when i see han gyul, and eun chan do what they do, im more like WOW!!! and that is kinda cool to see after so many dramas that leave me with a "That's it?"!!! so im exicited to see change, and maybe that's why im more addicted to cp because it eases my curiousity!!!...
You know how to hit a good topic...that's why im never bored!! Thank you!!! Keep blogging!

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

gail, yep, those are the age guidelines. If you recall the opening still frame on your drama file before the episode starts, that's basically a reiteration of the age limit. Most evening dramas are 15-and-up, although some that are targeted toward younger audiences (like Goong, I believe) may be 12-and-up.

wandergirl, i don't think Romance Hunter is being subbed. I remember hearing some group was going to do Hyena but I don't know if they ever did. I dl all my files through various clubboxes; if you have trouble finding one, shoot me an email (i'm a little nervous posting them directly here because i know a lot of the big CBs in korea ran into legal problems and were shut down earlier this year, so i want to be safe and respect their privacy).

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

#15 "Gail -- gramps, is that you?"

Hindi nga!. The timestamps give a clue that lolo and I are several zones apart. When lolo last posted it was around 2.00 am UK time. I'm actually the wrong side of that apparently crucial "mid-50s" age-band where, according to one other comment here, people have forgotten all about sex and don't want to be reminded about it in their TV viewing, so by that hour I am safely in bed and presumably asleep. What else is there for relics like me to do there?

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I had never thought Koreans were puritanical about sex regardless of how they were portrayed in the dramas because life just ain't like that in modern society. So when i watched unmoving kisses (as it it was put on pause mode!) while the camera pans 360 deg (lovers in Paris LOL, eventhough I love Park Shin Yang) and almost very few scenes that indicated the couple ever consumated their relationship.... I said, hey, this just ain't real, whoever kisses like that and when a couple love each other so much, how can they go with many YEARS without a sexual relationship - so I just take it as they do but the dramas just doesn't show it - and with that my heart and mind can accept it and move on!

KUDOS to "LOVERS" drama for being one of the leaders to show a lonnnnnnngggggggggggg passionate kiss that ended in bed.....and now Coffee Prince..... to me these scenes makes the dramas more realistic and natural......AJA

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

#14 Marzy "talking about your athlete’s foot at the dinner table"

Maybe that would be quite an innocent topic in Korea. One of the nice things about the shift to HDTV is you get to read all the shopfronts in the background (or you do if like me you're a text maniac). And lo and behold, it turns out that in Seoul there are branches of a sportshoe chain called, in all linguistic innocence, "Athlete's Foot". I thought those little shopsign gems were confined to France, where they are a constant source of amusement to Anglophones.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Hey! Great comments as usual and the speed of your posts continues to amaze me. Total non sequiter but didja hear that they're making a Hana Yori Dango movie to air sometime in summer 2008? Everyone from the original cast is coming back and from what little they've said, it seems like they might be following the Paris/Shizuka's wedding storyline that ended the manga not that long ago...

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

sorry to disagree with the rest...but what about those who're just not into pre-marital sex whatever the case is...those who still fear God and believe that He actually exists...I'm glad when many kdramas actually respect this group of people.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I actually love how asian dramas are more conservative and innocent when it comes to the love relationship between a man and a woman. Seriously, I've seen enough of those American shows where they would make out and jump on the bed in almost all scenes/episodes whatever. That's why I like watching asian dramas more, it's not extreme like the media over here.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

sorry no offense, but about pre-marital sex by the name of the temporary emotion/feeling so-called "love", do you seriously think it's lovely, honourable and pleasing to the conscience?

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I understand the viewpoints of all the commentators. Is the lack of showing any sexual/physical aspects of a relationship because of 1) censorship, 2) respect for the audience, 3) desire to teach the audience a lesson, or whatever else. But how are we to really believe that a couple is madly in love when all they do is kiss, and for the most part, kiss really badly too?! I mean, of most of the kdramas that I have see, the girlfriend and boyfriend often kiss like they hate each other (just a peck on the lips, really stiff, no movement of the mouth, lips, tongue, etc.). If kdramas really want to portray the realness of any relationships, they need to show that a pair of madly in love couple doesn't just give each other just a peck on the lips. And that it sometimes involves sex!

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *