This is really sad :-(. Choi Su-jong is one of my favorite actors, and I loved him in "(The) President." I agree with GF and KBS (hope they are sincere) that his health should come first and one would hope that he would take that very seriously *SMH.*

I wish him and Park Joo-mi and Choi Jae-sung a recovery period that would really allow them to rest and heal. There is a reason why after such accidents (and especially after they go through surgery), the patients are asked to stay home and actually recover AND let their bodies heal. I hope CSJ will listen to the voice of reason and I just hope that somehow the production team will find a solution to their many problems.

Still, health first. We only have one body... Thank you GF for this update, I had been thinking about this drama and about CSJ this week.

If he pulls out and someone bashed him, then shame on them for being so insensitive.

I hate to bring up an old issue but comaparing it to Han Ye Seul puts her in a bad light. I completely agree on her "protest" reasons, health shoukd be a priority. but then we get these actors like CSJ and it'd make you think how unprofessional she behaved by inconveniencing a lot of people. This level of dedication and professionalism from CSJ are quite admirable.

Uh... who's Anthony?

LOL with you Lavony. I think the Anthony of early KoDs would wish this on his nemesis, not so sure about current Anthony who goes into a building with fire to rescue an extra, at his own peril and risks.

If Anthony yelled at GE for not taking good care of herself, really, hum... What would Anthony do? (I would hope he would rest and make sure GE is by his side as often as possible :-) )

I don't like when I don't understand: Why commas are not used in titles? Cause I use them and it's not a problem at the moment. (Again, I'm not a professional writer so there must be something I don't get.)
"King's Dream" is the exact title of the drama. It's like "You've Fallen for Me": I don't see how you can avoid the comma...

My problem with the comma is that it implies the loss of the lead actress has not yet occurred - Mystisith, are you confusing commas with apostrophes?

meh? i'm as grammar'd up as the next person, but there's a sort of freedom that comes with writing article titles. errrnyways.

Grammarian here. A little bit about finicky English...

The grammar is omitting words. The complete title would be:

King's Dream is in danger of losing lead actor, which is on the heels of losing its lead actress.

"King's Dream is in danger of losing lead actor" is an independent clause

"which is on the heels of losing its lead actress." is a dependent clause. The dependent clause needs the first clause, so it gets a comma.

News titles do it frequently... they omit words. So does English, though more frequently it's on the object rather than the verb. (I am. That is a complete sentence--there is no object needed.)

English, though, being kinda the bohemian language it is picks up grammar rules and bits from other languages making it a pain in the butt. Thus you get seemingly illogical grammar exceptions.

Titles are one of those things. I used to complain to high heavens about titles, so my parents and teachers argued to me to fill in the missing words so I would get it. This in turn, helped me to fix the grammar.

Here, it seems like you are right (looks like a comma splice)... until the missing words are filled in and it is made a complete sentence instead of a fragment.

Once the implied words are fit into the sentence, you will see it is not a comma splice, but a legit use of a comma... in which case you could argue that the omission of words could be more efficient, but English titles follow separate rules from regular sentences, such as spoken ones follow different rules from written ones or that poems follow different form from stories.

Take it that way. And believe me I understand how nonsensical English is since I struggled against the stupid language for most of my childhood while a well-meaning fluent speaker told me to "sound it out" I don't think I have a chance of that when one word is Spanish, another is Old French, another Latin, another German and another is Japanese in origin and even there not all rules apply evenly. Get serious here.
Plurals: mouse mice die dice house houses deer deer sheep sheep bacterium bacteria virus viruses
Pronunciation: rough through tough threw rue though
Grammar: a th nothing... (my friends from other countries don't get what is the nothing? I had to explain... if you aren't sure if it is a or the, then it gets nothing... but then they are like, shouldn't you know? TT I'm sorrryyy), implied groups (We went to the furniture store. Why not furnitures Store? There were a school of fish. There are many kinds of fish. Why not fishes?), compound adjectives (which don't really exist in German nor French at least with hyphens like that), and exceptions to make your head bleed with the illogic of it.

That's what you get with a German language trying to be Latin. It was long on its way to being messed up before it tried to become a Lingua Franca. (Trade language)

Amen to that. I smelled witchcraft as soon as I reached the third paragraph XD
Sometimes, it's better to just LEAVE THE SHIP.

"they should do a ritual or something"—LOL.

They should do a kkut. Get a mudang there to purify the sets and costumes. Haha.