49

The Sex and the City Effect

I’ve been meaning to write this post for a while but it coincides with recent topics, so here goes.

I think there’s a prevalent (mistaken) perception — particularly if kdramas are a primary source of information — that Koreans are puritanical about sex. In my opinion, they really aren’t. There are traditional elements in the culture, of course (just thinking about discussing sex with family is a horrifying concept) — but it’s like that common misconception that every generation thinks it invented sex. What’s most conservative about Korea, perhaps, is the representation of sex in the media, but I think it would be short-sighted to assume the culture as a whole is some Victorian, pearl-clutching, bless-my-heart, faint-at-any-hint-of-indecency society.

To wit, I present exhibits A, B, and C: the kdramas (because it always comes back to dramas!) Coffee Prince, Hyena, and Romance Hunter. Yes, I know dramas aren’t a complete or accurate representation of society, but I think it’s worth pointing out that there’s a spectrum here, too.

 
First up, COFFEE PRINCE.

Someone sent me this article from Newsen (thanks, SJ) about the positive reaction from audiences to the candid, unflowery treatment of sex in Coffee Prince. The article came out before this week’s episodes 15 and 16, but I think the same applies in light of recent events, too.

“In discussing the factors contributing to this drama’s strong appeal, the frank discussion of sex among the main characters cannot be left out. This drama depicts how the love between a man and woman doesn’t merely end with a mental or emotional understanding of love, as in fairy-tale books.”

(Original Newsen article.)

The article cites the scene between Ha Rim and Eun Chan, where he asks her what she and Han Gyul did last night and chides her for not understanding a man’s sexual desires, as an example of this kind of frank talk. It also calls Han Sung and Yu Ju’s relationship “refreshing.”

“This couple is yet unmarried. However, Yu Ju and Han Sung have naturally progressed to a sexual relationship. This situation doesn’t feel very strange; they’re cool about their love, both mentally and physically. This couple of ten years loves each other in both mind and body.”

The article expresses a bit of surprise at the level of candor, because Coffee Prince’s handling of sex and love is rather new in the world of kdramas (at least the kind on broadcast TV). In that respect, the candor is not entirely familiar — but it’s entirely appreciated.

Next up: ROMANCE HUNTER.

This TVN cable drama aired earlier this year, and (rightly) found itself compared to Sex and the City. The mere setup — thirtyish working women talking openly about sex and going through the ups and downs of dating — is enough to merit the (ubiquitous!) SATC comparison, but Romance Hunter does pilfer a lot in its characterizations, too.

The five main characters and good friends (two of whom went on to portray rivals in Bad Couple) can all be assigned a SATC personality, or perhaps a combination of them. The main character is the most Carrie-like, narrating about the trials and tribulations of finding love. She’s no prude, but she’s still a bit naïve when it comes to finding her ideal guy. (She’s also a love advisor on a radio show called “Romance Hunter,” where all but one of the other women also work.) The girlfriends frequently go out for dinner and drinks to discuss their love lives.

There’s the writer-producer of the show, married with a kid, who’s the family breadwinner, often snappish at her slackerly husband — she resembles late-series Miranda. The younger one is naïve, feminine, and Charlotte-esque. Another is classic Samantha — experienced, cool, and unabashedly materialistic (wants a husband with the best possible qualifications, even if she likes someone else more). The last is the least SATC-like, the woman we all hate to see being treated badly by her boyfriend — we wish she’d chuck his sorry ass out on the pavement (heck, she wishes she could too) — but she’s too dependent, lonely, and/or in love.

Being a cable show (official TVN site), Romance Hunter is able to venture into more explicit scenes and discussion, bearing an age restriction of 19-and-up. Despite the overwhelming similarities of the show to SATC, I found myself able to enjoy the matter-of-fact way the characters discuss sex, without the coyness or preciousness that sometimes accompanies the topic on more mainstream broadcast dramas.

For instance, the woman with the asshole boyfriend does her best to treat him nicely, and receives nothing but dismissiveness in return. After she’s spent a long day working, then cooking and cleaning for him, he finds solo gratification in demanding a blowjob (asserting his demand with the never-cool downward head-push), then relaxing back with no intention of returning the favor. On top of that, he takes offense to how his girlfriend won’t “swallow” — insinuating that spitting means she doesn’t love him.

 

 
Then, our main heroine goes to a motel with a new boyfriend, eagerly anticipating her first time having sex with with him, only to be sorely disappointed at his early finish. Or shall we say premature finish. He’s not the most handsome catch, but she’s found herself falling for his earnestness and kindness — but the day after the failed attempt, she moans to her friend, “What if he’s always like that? I hate rabbits!” (Rabbits might best be translated with the English counterpart “minutemen.”)

 
There’s more to the story than just sex, of course — at the core is the familiar theme of women looking for love and (hopefully) finding it. Romance Hunter is light amusement — and at first I was on the fence about continuing. But I’m female, and I’m weak, because the hint of what will probably be the final romantic pairing for our leads is this guy right here >>>. Currently, he’s a PD also working at the radio station, whom the heroine talks to easily and comfortably. I’m guessing his role will gradually become bigger as he watches the main character stumble through one failed romance after another.

 

(Also bearing the Sex and the City comparison is the short mini-drama (also cable, also 19+) Five Girls, but IMO, that show isn’t worth your time. You can check out the official site here if you care to.)

 

Last up: HYENA

This TVN cable drama (19+) was billed as the male Sex and the City, and I certainly see where that comes from. (Official site here.)

What I like about Hyena is that despite the SATC comparison, its characterization of the four male friends feels more natural, and less forced into a mold, than in Romance Hunter. While Romance Hunter feels like an attempt to be modern, Hyena has a ring of “this is what guys really are like.”

It’s very boys-will-be-boys, as we watch our main character (played by Kim Min Jong) stumble through and muck up a good relationship. He’s due to be married any day now (to his longtime girlfriend, played by Park Shi Yeon) but can’t help himself from looking at every hot girl who walks by. We wince along, knowing he’s ruining things for himself.

In fact, the thing I don’t quite like about Hyena is probably also the thing that makes it more watchable — and that is in seeing Kim Min Jong’s character suffer for his stupidity. He’s a bit too reckless and inconsiderate for me to care about his well-being (after the first episode), but since he doesn’t get away with his foolishness, I’m able to watch without wanting to throw something at him.

One friend is even worse than he is — the only thing holding him back from being insufferably unscrupulous is the fact that he’s perhaps less good-looking than his friends, and doesn’t have quite as many opportunities. Still, he’ll do (and say) anything to get a girl into bed, and has no pride to speak of where sex is concerned.

A third friend (Oh Man Seok) is the complete opposite — highly principled and extremely picky. On every blind date, he asks the woman a logic problem, and doesn’t bother cultivating any interest if she fails to answer. Then, when he finally meets a woman who answers correctly, he takes an interest in her — but then sees her poorly groomed feet and is immediately turned off. (You know, Oh Man Seok isn’t the most handsome actor around, and his character isn’t even a type to make the ladies swoon — yet — but there’s something really compelling about him.)

The fourth friend is a cool, detached playboy who doesn’t seem to have any emotional attachment to anyone, and regards the women who throw themselves at him with mild amusement.

 

Dude, when I started this post, I totally had a point, and now it’s kind of fizzled into the air. So I’ll just say this: I’m not saying Korean culture is wild and sex-crazed, but as with anything, there’s a range. I just thought it was worth pointing out something on this end of the drama spectrum.

Tags: , , , ,

49

Required fields are marked *

great powers of observation.
thanks for continuing to stimulate dialogue.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I'm glad that sex is being more open in these dramas! though I personally could care less for Sex in the City type shows (SITC made me gag, not for the sex or the plot, but for the women in the show). What I do like is how Coffee Prince is changing things up a bit.

What drew me to Coffee Prince is it shows that love has no gender, which is what I also like about the Japanese and Taiwanese dramas, Hana Kimi- You simply fall in love with the person you are most attracted to on a physical and emotional level. HG fell in love with EC even he thought she was a boy, it truly shows that love has no bounds.

I also love how it touched on women being more independent (such as EC being the head of her family, or wanting to wait to get married until she has settled with her life and is making a general income so she doesn't have to live off of HG). What got me the most though was, though EC is more conservative and thinks you don't have sex until after marriage, even she is human and understands that you can be with the person you love married or not.

Great post!

-Jamie

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

kdramas do generally tend to hold back a lot about sex but the movies are far more open about it. The same actors who appear passionate in movies hold back in dramas. I don't know why that is, but that's just the way it appears.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Actually, I know why that is... I'm sure there's censorship in Korean T.V. just like there is in American T.V.

But as an American (well, kinda) viewer, it is quite frustrating to watch a supposedly passionate couple kiss like they are 5 year olds... or cold fish.

It is nice to see Han Gul and Yu Ju because for starters, they are both in their thirties and for years, had no plans to get married so it would make no sense to not have sex. What would they be waiting for?

Other dramas have pre-marital sex (Queen of the Game but they end up with a baby), Dal Ja's Spring and Kim Sam Soon (although they made it comedic), Lovers etc etc so pre-marital sex in dramas still not unchartered waters.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Sarah, this is a very interesting post. I'd never heard of/watched the shows you described, but in my time with K-drama I've noticed mainstream shows becoming bolder regarding the physical side of love. Coming from a culture that is "hypocritically" (I guess that might/might not be too strong a word) conservative in its silver screen too, I can completely understand what you mean that its not all representative of the actual population. Just because it takes 6-7 episodes for our leads to peck each other's cheeks leads to the presumption that in Korea (or India) you'd never see a couple kiss! Which is, ofcourse, a complete misconception, and there are instances when people get a true cultural shock because they don't find the naive nation they expected. On the other hand, with the American screen already open about sexuality with shows like SATC, or Will & Grace, Girlfriends, etc., there's a LARGE idea that most Americans are sex-crazed and continually making out in the streets. HA. Its actually what a lot of new students from conservative countries expect to find here. I think thats a very fascinating aspect of culture and media...how it gets broadcasted in a movie or a show can completely change the perception of the world.
Back to Korea, I think with shows like CP, k-drama PDs are testing the waters and realizing that the culture's ready for a more candid view of sex and love too. I'm not sure if it created any kind of controversy in Korea (did it?). When I started watching, the climax and end of the show was often a kiss. Now, as shows get more realistic, and relationships are better developed like in MNIKSS, "skinship ;)" is more present and nicely done.
With Bollywood in the past few years (if you're interested!), there's been a kind of frantic craze to catch up to the Western world, in trying to talk about sex and fitting it in awkwardly and often vulgarly. Sex and conversations about sex are still depicted very crudely or unnaturally in a large part of Indian cinema (and not at all in the starkly conservative Indian dramas), which really disappoints me. Passion and emotion can be portrayed more gracefully, like done in CP perhaps. And it can be discussed with more wit and realism, like SATC, or, based on what you described, Romance Hunters. Regardless of those opinions, there's atleast a similar effort to shake off the false cloak of "we don't touch fingers until marriage" kind of idea that the world has. I think thats healthy and important, to realize that people everywhere, in cultures like ours, are all aware of the physical aspect of love and maintain a healthy, natural sexuality.
Thanks for that insight, Sarah!

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Yes, a sense of censorship (and the age guidelines) keep graphic content toned down on broadcast television -- but I suppose I'm talking more about the treatment of the issue, not necessarily the explicit content showing it. (Which is also why films are much freer in how they handle sexual and adult material.) Dramas like Dal Ja and Samsoon did involve sex, and for the most part I think it was handled well, though I still think they handled it with a bit of preciousness. Not that I want it to be treated crudely, but there's also something refreshing -- to borrow the reporter's words -- about being matter-of-fact and candid.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

funny thing is, this morning I was also wondering how sex was perceived in the korean culture ... because dramas never seem to explore that side of relationships...its all about the emotional part, but i just gotta wonder if those people (characters) aren't sexualy frustrasted with all the talking...I mean in "Exhibitions of fireworks" the character played by Han chae Young was with her boyfriend for almost a decade and they had never, ever ...ever... e.v.e.r...had sex...I mean I don't know a man that would go 2 months without ...but then again people do say "you can't miss something you've never had," but i doubt that goes for anybody over the age of 17-especially for boys-... Its good to see that there are dramas such as Coffee Prince, that are not afraid of talking about sex, though it they don't take it lightly...But i do admire that side of Korean culture... Not the fact that the media is trying to portray an asexual kind of a society, but the fact that sex is not something they take lightly... thanks for sharing this J-Beans

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I thought Koreans were probably puritanical about sex until I saw Kim Sung Soo's debut movie about love and sex (I forget the name). :O I nearly had a heart attack with its extraordinarily frank portrayal of sex...

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

In the time it took for me to post my comment, it became moot lol

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Rather than Korean society being puritanical, I just assumed that it was due to a deeply developed sense of social courtesy/sensibility to not talk about sex;especially in polite company. And, that sense governs the extent of discussing any sexual issues in the dramas because the drama has to be polite and courteous to the viewer. Discussing sex would be tantamount to talking about your athlete's foot at the dinner table. I'm not so familiar with Korean society, but I'm pretty sure that it's true for Chinese society.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I have often wondered if kdramas are reflective of society or if they are didactic...attempting to "teach" viewers how to behave (I hope that doesn't sound too strong)...they seem to be family-centric at least in terms of marital conditions/parental approval for marriage...they also seem to emphasize self-sacrifice (most often, it seems, for the sake of family)

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Perhaps they are trying to get the largest audience possible? Because my mom and her friends (all in the mid-50s) won't watch shows that are heavy on the sex and intimate relationships. It's one of the main reasons none of them watch American TV and movies and stick to Asian ones.

And while the younger audience might not be offended, they aren't turned off when sex isn't portrayed.

So by being more conservative, the show can attract a larger "family" audience.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Romance Hunter and Hyena both sound interesting. I can't find a Wiki page for Romance Hunter, so maybe it's not subbed by fans? I hope it's also available on Clubbox

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

"Rather than Korean society being puritanical, I just assumed that it was due to a deeply developed sense of social courtesy/sensibility to not talk about sex;especially in polite company. And, that sense governs the extent of discussing any sexual issues in the dramas because the drama has to be polite and courteous to the viewer. Discussing sex would be tantamount to talking about your athlete’s foot at the dinner table. I’m not so familiar with Korean society, but I’m pretty sure that it’s true for Chinese society."

Auntie Mame makes a good point. I think in a way its trying to be more polite and not talk about it too much about in public. Im thinking these dramas are made by those, maybe coz they want help people open up and introduce a more open view and test waters. Its a topic for them to be kept more private? I also like the fact that in Kculture, sez isnt taken that lightly and for it to be shown in a different aspect makes it different from other cultures. But i think audiences are becoming more mature about it, i can also name 'What's Up Fox' as one of those risque dramas, after the steamy scene from Lovers as well. But I agree with Sarah, that like dramas like Samsoon and Dalja it was handled well. That's better to see I think.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

to lolo, gramps is that you?

"Dude, when I started this post, I totally had a point." That made me laugh out loud. Coming from Javabeans, from whom quality and, of course, a point are expected, that was funny.

Oh, I have a question I have always meant on researching. When I watch dramas, I see a little yellow (I think it's yellow, but I'm not sure. I'm color-memory-challenged.) circle with a number in it on the upper right hand corner of my screen. Usually it's a 15 or a 13. I've always wondered what it stood for. But I see the number 19 on your screencaps for "Romance Hunter." Does that number stand for the age-restriction?

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I never really saw it that way, but i did wonder why in some dramas the "LOVE "scenes were a bit dull, or conservative!!! but after cp, when i see han gyul, and eun chan do what they do, im more like WOW!!! and that is kinda cool to see after so many dramas that leave me with a "That's it?"!!! so im exicited to see change, and maybe that's why im more addicted to cp because it eases my curiousity!!!...
You know how to hit a good topic...that's why im never bored!! Thank you!!! Keep blogging!

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

gail, yep, those are the age guidelines. If you recall the opening still frame on your drama file before the episode starts, that's basically a reiteration of the age limit. Most evening dramas are 15-and-up, although some that are targeted toward younger audiences (like Goong, I believe) may be 12-and-up.

wandergirl, i don't think Romance Hunter is being subbed. I remember hearing some group was going to do Hyena but I don't know if they ever did. I dl all my files through various clubboxes; if you have trouble finding one, shoot me an email (i'm a little nervous posting them directly here because i know a lot of the big CBs in korea ran into legal problems and were shut down earlier this year, so i want to be safe and respect their privacy).

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

#15 "Gail -- gramps, is that you?"

Hindi nga!. The timestamps give a clue that lolo and I are several zones apart. When lolo last posted it was around 2.00 am UK time. I'm actually the wrong side of that apparently crucial "mid-50s" age-band where, according to one other comment here, people have forgotten all about sex and don't want to be reminded about it in their TV viewing, so by that hour I am safely in bed and presumably asleep. What else is there for relics like me to do there?

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I had never thought Koreans were puritanical about sex regardless of how they were portrayed in the dramas because life just ain't like that in modern society. So when i watched unmoving kisses (as it it was put on pause mode!) while the camera pans 360 deg (lovers in Paris LOL, eventhough I love Park Shin Yang) and almost very few scenes that indicated the couple ever consumated their relationship.... I said, hey, this just ain't real, whoever kisses like that and when a couple love each other so much, how can they go with many YEARS without a sexual relationship - so I just take it as they do but the dramas just doesn't show it - and with that my heart and mind can accept it and move on!

KUDOS to "LOVERS" drama for being one of the leaders to show a lonnnnnnngggggggggggg passionate kiss that ended in bed.....and now Coffee Prince..... to me these scenes makes the dramas more realistic and natural......AJA

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

#14 Marzy "talking about your athlete’s foot at the dinner table"

Maybe that would be quite an innocent topic in Korea. One of the nice things about the shift to HDTV is you get to read all the shopfronts in the background (or you do if like me you're a text maniac). And lo and behold, it turns out that in Seoul there are branches of a sportshoe chain called, in all linguistic innocence, "Athlete's Foot". I thought those little shopsign gems were confined to France, where they are a constant source of amusement to Anglophones.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Hey! Great comments as usual and the speed of your posts continues to amaze me. Total non sequiter but didja hear that they're making a Hana Yori Dango movie to air sometime in summer 2008? Everyone from the original cast is coming back and from what little they've said, it seems like they might be following the Paris/Shizuka's wedding storyline that ended the manga not that long ago...

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

sorry to disagree with the rest...but what about those who're just not into pre-marital sex whatever the case is...those who still fear God and believe that He actually exists...I'm glad when many kdramas actually respect this group of people.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I actually love how asian dramas are more conservative and innocent when it comes to the love relationship between a man and a woman. Seriously, I've seen enough of those American shows where they would make out and jump on the bed in almost all scenes/episodes whatever. That's why I like watching asian dramas more, it's not extreme like the media over here.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

sorry no offense, but about pre-marital sex by the name of the temporary emotion/feeling so-called "love", do you seriously think it's lovely, honourable and pleasing to the conscience?

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I understand the viewpoints of all the commentators. Is the lack of showing any sexual/physical aspects of a relationship because of 1) censorship, 2) respect for the audience, 3) desire to teach the audience a lesson, or whatever else. But how are we to really believe that a couple is madly in love when all they do is kiss, and for the most part, kiss really badly too?! I mean, of most of the kdramas that I have see, the girlfriend and boyfriend often kiss like they hate each other (just a peck on the lips, really stiff, no movement of the mouth, lips, tongue, etc.). If kdramas really want to portray the realness of any relationships, they need to show that a pair of madly in love couple doesn't just give each other just a peck on the lips. And that it sometimes involves sex!

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Instead of stepping rashly on any of the mines currently lying around this area, let me offer a short extract from a genre that flourished briefly in the 1980s, the English Campus novel. The scene is the English Midlands in early 1986.

Vic Wilcox was restively watching television with his younger son, Gary, in the lounge of their five-bedroomed, four-lavatoried, neo-Georgian house on Avondale Road. [...] You saw things on television nowadays that would have been under-the-counter pornography when he was a lad. It made family viewing an anxious and uncomfortable business. "You don't want to watch any more of this, do you?" he said to Gary, with affected casualness.
"It's all right,", said Gary, slumped in an armchair, without taking his eyes from the screen.
"Let's see what's on the other channels".
"No, Dad, don't!"
Overriding Gary's protests, Vic played a short scale on the buttons of the remote control. The other channels were showing: a documentary about sheepdogs, a repeat of an American detective series about a murdered prostitute, and another feature film, the hero and heroine of which were already in bed together and wrestling energetically under the covers. Vic quickly switched back to the first channel, where the girl was now slowly unbuttoning her blouse in front of a mirror while the man looked lasciviously over her shoulder. It was only a matter of time, Vic thought, before he scored a pornographic jackpot, simulated copulation on all four channels simultaneously.

David Lodge, Nice Work (1988)

Four channels. Those were the days. Nowadays, with more like 400, the jackpot might be more difficult to score (but that's partly because 100 or so of them are shopping channels or suchlike, keener on faux suede than simulated sex). But still, this is the general idea of where Korean TV is headed. So enjoy its current state of relative innocence while you can, those of you who do.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I believe media can dictate a whole new level of attitude/behavior among us audience. But I also believe that we are smarting up. It's a symbiotic relationship. That's why ratings exists. Networks rely on them. So if the success of Samsoon, Dalja's Spring, Coffee Prince and the likes reflects the kind of society Korea is in right now then Koreans have nothing to worry about being misconstrued as puritans. Korea wouldn't be called progressive for nothing.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

"he takes offense to how his girlfriend won’t “swallow” — insinuating that spitting means she doesn’t love him"

javabeans, I think that for the sake of all those anxious to preserve their wholesome image of you and your blog, you should have explained that this is a reference to those scenes, strangely common in KDrama, of semi-synchronised tooth-cleaning. The issue being whether it shows more consideration to bravely swallow the toothpaste when using someone else's bathroom facilities than to spit into their nice clean basin.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I just realized that our comments are based, mainly, on a western-styled society viewpoint. But, I think Korean society is based more on Confucian teachings and beliefs. So, I was wondering how, and if any, Confucian doctrines impact the scope of the dramas.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I'm a bit more ambivalent on the idea of the portrayal of sexuality and sex in K dramas. One the one hand it is refreshing to watch relationship develop through what my philosophy and film professor called "play". In a nutshell in older movies of the 40's and 50's we saw romance develop through banter, wordplay, non-sexual physical interaction with one another. Couples who played well together tended to have more meaningful interaction. The Big Sleep (1946) with Lauren Bacall and Humphrey Bogart is a great example, as is Indiscreet (1958) with Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman.
One of the things I love about K dramas is that there is a real sense that the protagonists really get to discover before the start of all the heart (and fist!) clenching angst. The couples tend to be like dogs sniping @ each others heels and the women tend to be the aggressors (which is another topic all together). It's fun, it's charming and it hearkens to an ideal that intimacy is not just "knockin' boots" with someone sexy. In Coffee Prince we sense that Yu Ju and Han Sung play well and their problems stem from not knowing themselves well enough to trust the other.
The portrayal of intimacy in dramas though seems overwhelmingly stilted and forced. Usually a lot is played as broad comedy, or even in serious moments we get an unnatural physical distance in a hug or kiss and you can almost see the actors step out of character and start to think of what they are meant to be portraying. Even my beloved Coffee Prince is guilty, resorting to the hike-and-slam-into-wall hollwood portrayal of intense passion didn't quite jibe with the the rest of the series. In a perfect world, the romance would retain the fun and lose the stiffness...
My worry is that a more "natural" (i guess is the word i'm looking for) representation of affection may be lost in the battle for ratings. And, as a caveat, I do have to say that I don't have access to any of the korean cable shows, so don't know too much about them.

Long winded and boring but 2 cents nonetheless

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

twreckx

what an excellent point! I also like that about kdramas (the 'play'). If I had my way, there would be both. A long build up before deep kisses etc. I guess the trouble I have is that there always seems to be more touching before a couple gets together. The added complication that CP had was that EC was treated as a guy for most of the series, which lends itself to more physical play...but after her gender is revealed, HK starts treating her differently (as is to be expected)

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

DianB
I totally agree with you! In fact, because they were so physically comfortable with each other (i am highly impressed and truly loved that both actors really captured that sense of camaraderie between 2 guys), Coffee Prince had a great sense of play. Eun Chan's and Han Gyul's relationship, even with the underlying attraction to each other, was a lot of fun to watch. The added constraints of him not knowing that she was in fact, a she, forced him to REALLY get to know her and be truly sure he was willing to take that step and potentially oppose family and friends. As for EC, a lot of it was really accepting herself for who she was also needed her to really get her to know him and trust him. Friendship can never be overrated when it comes to love...

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

What excellent comments! Great post, javabeans...

First off: No, i don't think the viewers generalize Koreans' (or anyone's) sexual behaviours based on what we see on the screen (big or small). I like to believe that we are more than mere poriferans absorbing X-radiation emitting from our television sets/computer monitors. I do realize that, with anything, there is considerable variations in beliefs and actions. However, i do notice if the actions do not feel natural to the progression of the relationship or seem removed from the normal behaviours that human beings (no matter what continent you are on) should exhibit. All I'm asking for is to make it "natural", people... if sex is not pivotal to the scene then skip it, but if nudity (gasp!) is essential to the plot, then go for it! But whatever it is, do it tastefully and gracefully. And give the audience some respect: we are neither sexually ignorant or sex-deprived (maybe?), so make it appropriate. Isn't art (not that i am saying that Kdrama=art -or not art) basically a summation of actions and reactions? We are bound to differ on how things should be done as well as our interpretations of the results.

It is true that contents of public television are restricted due to cultural differences, respects, censorship, ratings, sponsorship, etc... Without cable, we would be bound by mainstream ideas and conventions. I'm one for pushing the envelopes, but i don't think it is appropriate to impose my beliefs on others. Thank god for HBO. Hooray for diversity and individualism, yeah?

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

twreckx, as a fan of the classics myself, I've always had a sneaking suspicion that what is not show is more sexy then what is. Maybe because the classic movies leave it to the imagination, more. Remembering the passionate kisses in the More the Merrier, you know what its about without it being spelled out.

I like that about korean dramas. Its one of the reasons I started watching them, aside from being a manhwa Full House fan. I can watch them with my family without feeling uncomfortable, or wondering if I have to turn the channel so my little brother doesn't see it. I also agree with Plue and Fay. I think one of the unfortunate things about the women's movement is that it helped promote sex without marriage. I think pre-martial sex has created so many problems in societies. Sex is important not just as an illustration of love, but also as means of showing commitment between people and as a baby maker.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Gramps,
My curiosity got the better of me so I'm using this medium to ask you a question that has nothing to do with this particular post by Sarah. How does a man from UK even learn about the existence of kdramas let alone be such an avid fan? My husband also hails from UK (now in California) and just shakes his head when I'm watching kdramas and bemoans the loss of "wifey" to this non-sensical entertainment.
Amy

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

it was a very interesting read.
I have not seen any of those dramasa but especially Hyena sounds interesting but I have not found it anywhere.
The relationships in Coffee prince are nice because it is so natural, they are just like any normal couple.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

#29 Auntie Mame -- "how, and if any, Confucian doctrines impact the scope of the dramas"

I see nobody's snapped at this particular bait. Not surprising really, because it's a BEEEG issue. I don't know nearly enough to dare to attempt a contribution myself, but maybe one pointer might help.

What we're really talking about here is not Confucianism of the kind(s) found elsewhere in Asia, but the specific, systematic and protracted shaping of Korean society and culture along "Neo-Confucian" lines during the Choson dynasty. For an expert view, with some real historical/sociological/anthropological meat, particularly on the cumulative effect, and the abiding legacy, of legislation on the position of women (and hence the bearing on the sort of view of these dramas were seeing here), try Martina Deuchler, The Confucian Transformation of Korea: A Study of Society and Ideology, Harvard 1995. Still in print, in the library of virtually any College anywhere that covers East Asian Studies and in many larger city libraries too. Readily available secondhand for $20 or less. Not exactly a poolside read, but the prose is sprightly enough and no drier than the subject matter sometimes demands.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Amyable, I certainly can't speak for Gramps (or anyone else), but if anything, having this site has shown me that kdrama fans are a much, much more diverse and widespread bunch than I could've previously guessed. I continue to be surprised. I've gotten web hits from every continent minus Antarctica -- yup, including Africa.

And me, wholesome? Who needs that? LOL. I'm sure it's because of censorship and broadcast standards, but I've been checking out more cable shows and they're really a lot edgier than I would've thought. For me, the word "cable" makes me think basic cable which isn't THAT much more risque than network television (FX, TNT, Sci-Fi...), but Korean cable is much more on the HBO range of things. In fact, there's one I'm debating posting about at all because it's pretty twisted and I'm not sure how people will like hearing about it. Borderline offensive for some, I think, although I find it darkly funny. Anyone care to read about Dasepo Naughty Girls (tv show, not the movie)?

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Sure. From what little I have found about it on the Internet, Dasepo Naughty Girls sounds interesting.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Sounds like you just made us an Offer We Can't Refuse. (AKA "Every TV series You'd Like to Know, but Always been Afraid to Ask...")
And #35 Amyable -- Craving javabeans' pardon for yet again talking behind her back, though I suppose her remark just now sort of gives me advance absolution, if you look at the last part of http://www.dramabeans.com/kdrama-scripts/#comment-5463 I think you'll discover how this particular fan got hooked.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

:)

And why "including Africa?" As in, why single it out?

I'm a Nigerian girl in the diaspora who loves watching kdramas and I know many other Africans who enjoy kdramas as well. In the 90s, older Mexican telenovelas (Wild Rose, The Rich Also Cry etc etc) were very big in Africa so kdrama is almost like an extension of them. Also, back in the 80s, bollywood was very big in Africa.

Your blog is quite popular so it only makes sense that English speaking Africans (especially) who check out kdramas online would come across and visit it.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Apologies, CW! Again, it must be my own bias of constantly being amazed that non-Koreans are interested in Korean culture. Kind of like a "My, you're interested in little ol' me?" reaction mixed with a healthy portion of self-loathing at one's own motherland (ya love it, ya hate it). It must be my own ignorance, so I apologize for the idiocy. :)

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Although, taking a different tack: there are statistically-grounded reasons for remarking on the fact that there are visitors from the African continent; just as statistics can help explain the rather disappointing fact that there are no readers of this blog yet recorded in Antarctica.

Let's look at the world in terms of IP addresses currently allocated. No less than 55% of those are in the US and Canada alone. The whole of Asia, by far the most populous continent, has around 14% of all addresses, while Africa has just 1.5% or thereabouts. Hence the mild surprise, but considerable delight, at finding that even in this numerically very small proportion of all the potential visitors to this blog there are javabeans and KDrama fans. The percentage of addresses located in Antarctica comes in with two zeroes after the decimal point, so it may take a while yet for those lonely folk in desolate research stations to reveal that KDrama is really what keeps them going through that long winter night. But looked at another way, even though the number of IP addresses assigned to Antarctica is tiny, the population of the continent is so small that there are about 4 IP addresses per person. Such relative saturation levels aren't achieved even in Silicon Valley. So give Antarctica a bit more time, and who knows? Since CB downloads over typical 512kb/s satellite links would mean a single episode would take a very long time to arrive, javabeans' concise but content-rich recaps would be all the more valued.

The tables and maps behind this summary are at http://www.ipligence.com/worldmap/ Incidentally, outfits like this which, for a price, will tell you to within a specified distance exactly where your incoming clients are situated simply from their IP address, lie behind the way that advertisers whose popup adds are triggered by sites such a Megaupload are able to send out images of somewhat underdressed and desperate-looking young ladies allegedly living in your home town and eager to meet you right now at the flip of a credit card.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

"The percentage of addresses located in Antarctica comes in with two zeros after the decimal point, so it may take a while yet for those lonely folk in desolate research stations to reveal that KDrama is really what keeps them going through that long winter night."

LMAO :) :) :)

Right you are!

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Javabeans,
It's all good :D

I don't think it's really about being interested in Korean culture but about enjoying the entertainment. Plus, there are some similarities between the Korean culture and many African cultures especially in familial relations. For example, the whole Oppa/Unni/Noona/Hyung thing. Well, while the younger generation generally finds it passe to call their elder siblings anything but their names, the practice is still very much alive with the older generations, referring to their elder siblings as either "Sister" or "Sister Toyin." Well, by my generation, I refer to the younger city dwellers who like to think of themselves as somewhat westernized. Also, similar to the Ajumma/Ajusshi thing, you refer to older friends/acquaintances/family friends as Uncle/Aunty even though they aren't blood relatives.

Also, I remember when I started watching daily dramas and they had elaborate traditional wedding scenes where the groom's family would go over the bride's family with gifts. Of course, in Africa, the details vary with the culture but in general, but we have something similar.

Even the importance of parental approval when one's choosing a life partner isn't something foreign.

One of the reasons Bollywood was widely watched in many countries in Africa was because it was "clean." You could easily watch the movies with your entire family with no fear of stumbling onto a sex scene. The same 'cleanliness' generally exists in kdramas so it may explain why some Africans might enjoy them.

So even though the characters look different and speak a different language, there are many ways we can relate to them. Plus, who doesn't like a good story? But of course, the more I watch kdramas, the more I'm interested in Korea as a whole.

But I can understand your amazement with foreigners enjoying your shows. Nollywood (Nigerian movie industry) blew up in the last ten years or so and not only is it replacing Hollywood in many ways throughout Africa, it's also huge in the Caribbean (especially Jamaica). But if I were to hear it was huge in some other places, I'd be shocked especially as I have a love-hate relationship with it.

Gramps, since 1.5% of IP address are in Africa, maybe it'll be shocking if 40% of her visitors were from the continent, no? But 0.05% shouldn't be too shocking. :)

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Wow, these discussions have really evolved and expanded. There's enough material, in this blog alone, to create an inter-disciplinary college course, based on CP.
And, JavaBean, please pardon me, but I just have to thank Gramps for the the information about the Deuchler book. I'm going book hunting tomorrow! Perhaps, the book will alleviate any CP withdrawal syptoms that crops up ... hee,hee.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Auntie Mame -- "an inter-disciplinary college course"

and throwing in calculus and its applications (see CP Ep Ch16 comments re EC's educational requirements for barista-dom) and now statistical inference. CW - hats off you you, you are quite right about the non-shocking nature of the order of percentage African visitors represent. I had thought the only person I had to be wary of before indulging in statistical bluff was my son, who does stats for a living but certainly doesn't read KDrama blogs.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

interesting! are Hyena or Romance Hunter subbed by a group?

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

@gramps...

good points there.. tagalog ka ba?

Korean culture's conception is greatly affected by Kdramas (especially countries who can't watch tv shows or media stuff directly from Korea like here in the Philippines just to name one). We have massive misconceptions about its being so conservative on 'sensitive' issues like this.
this post helps a lot. thanks JB.. i'm not so fond of putting up comments but everytime i surf the net i go to ur site always.. as in..

God bless.. :D

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *